-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor cython interface: copying.pyx
#10359
Merged
rapids-bot
merged 20 commits into
rapidsai:branch-22.04
from
isVoid:improvement/ListOfColumnsRefactor/copying
Mar 8, 2022
Merged
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a0b0f8c
Refactoring table_slice
isVoid 9e79492
Refactor `table_empty_like`.
isVoid cd14022
Refactor split
isVoid 85ff332
Unify type declaration
isVoid cd82492
Merge branch 'branch-22.04' of github.com:rapidsai/cudf into improvem…
isVoid 4fd6dd9
Refactor scatter
isVoid f0d8b6b
Revert _data_column introduction
isVoid 6834175
doc fix
isVoid da613a1
Revert more _data_columns introduction
isVoid 52df3cb
Remove TODO that's tracked elsewhere.
isVoid e14251a
Merge branch 'branch-22.04' into improvement/ListOfColumnsRefactor/co…
vyasr 9d878f1
review comments
isVoid 0afc3e7
Avoid dup work in split
isVoid 6795686
Merge branch 'improvement/ListOfColumnsRefactor/copying' of github.co…
isVoid a287693
Merge branch 'branch-22.04' of github.com:rapidsai/cudf into improvem…
isVoid 071b393
Merge branch 'branch-22.04' of github.com:rapidsai/cudf into improvem…
isVoid 5807329
Update python/cudf/cudf/core/indexed_frame.py
isVoid c0d8d8e
Update python/cudf/cudf/core/indexed_frame.py
isVoid 9959a6c
Merge branch 'improvement/ListOfColumnsRefactor/copying' of github.co…
isVoid f4349bd
Deindent
isVoid File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Something to think about: is there a better way for us to handle scalar vs column functions? We have this division in a lot of our Cython layers, can we think of a way to reduce it? One option would be to define generic scalar/column functions (not sure exactly what that would look like) and then passing specialized functions as arguments to handle different features. This is a very speculative idea, so no need to have an answer in this PR, but I do dislike duplicating this scalar/column division over and over.