-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW] DataFrame insert
and creation optimizations
#10285
Merged
rapids-bot
merged 11 commits into
rapidsai:branch-22.04
from
galipremsagar:insert_optimizations
Feb 16, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5470de9
faster scalar broadcasting
galipremsagar eeb1f34
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/branch-22.04' into insert_opti…
galipremsagar c42c0e8
ignore double reindexing
galipremsagar 4b20ef8
reduce reindexing
galipremsagar 4860ed5
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/branch-22.04' into insert_opti…
galipremsagar c1d8457
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/branch-22.04' into insert_opti…
galipremsagar 9d6142b
more optimization
galipremsagar 334eb4d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/branch-22.04' into insert_opti…
galipremsagar d3e062f
address reviews
galipremsagar 42515d2
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/branch-22.04' into insert_opti…
galipremsagar 33bad4d
address reviews
galipremsagar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's probably a faster way to construct this if we know the input is a
cudf.Series
. I'm not sure how much we could save for a pandas Series by handling it manually, I don't think we typically do anything special for those. That may be worth exploring in a future PR (basically seeing if we can implementSeries.from_pandas
in a more efficient manner than just calling the constructor), but is out of scope for now.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I think it is out of scope for this PR. The reason is we have other places in the code-base which use similar patterns we might be better off tackling that in a separate PR all at a time.