-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 915
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve hash join detail functions #10273
Merged
rapids-bot
merged 3 commits into
rapidsai:branch-22.04
from
PointKernel:fix-hash-join-detail-func-bug
Feb 12, 2022
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It looks like this
if
statement is for an early exit with an empty result. However, we're callingcudf::detail::left_join
before the early-exit. None of the early exit conditionsleft_on.empty()
,right_on.empty()
, oris_trivial_join(left, right, ...)
appear to depend on the result of the call tocudf::detail::left_join
.It seems like we could move these lines up, so that the
if
statement and early exit could be evaluated earlier in the function. Similarly forfull_join
below. (Am I missing something important?)Apologies for expanding the scope of the PR review twice -- this just seemed important for performance.
#7454 is where this section of code was last changed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! And tbh no need to apologize at all. I'm working on improving the hash join performance #10248 thus found small issues here and there. That's also why this PR exists 😄. The goal is to improve hash join!