You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
"Does Spark differentiate binary types stored as int8 and uint8? Are both of these equivalent from Spark’s perspective? Can Spark normalize inputs to use only one or the other? It feels very suspicious to me that we’ve decided to accept either one across the binary code paths."
It was pointed out that the code path in parquet support both INT8 columns and UINT8 columns. We should simply be opinionated here and after discussion it was decided to use UINT8.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hyperbolic2346
changed the title
Need to remove unsigned int8 references in parquet binary code path.
Need to remove unsigned uint8 references in parquet binary code path.
Aug 15, 2022
hyperbolic2346
changed the title
Need to remove unsigned uint8 references in parquet binary code path.
Need to remove unsigned int8 references in parquet binary code path.
Aug 16, 2022
hyperbolic2346
changed the title
Need to remove unsigned int8 references in parquet binary code path.
Need to remove int8 column support in parquet binary code path.
Aug 24, 2022
This issue has been labeled inactive-30d due to no recent activity in the past 30 days. Please close this issue if no further response or action is needed. Otherwise, please respond with a comment indicating any updates or changes to the original issue and/or confirm this issue still needs to be addressed. This issue will be labeled inactive-90d if there is no activity in the next 60 days.
"Does Spark differentiate binary types stored as int8 and uint8? Are both of these equivalent from Spark’s perspective? Can Spark normalize inputs to use only one or the other? It feels very suspicious to me that we’ve decided to accept either one across the binary code paths."
Originally posted by @bdice in #11526 (comment)
It was pointed out that the code path in parquet support both INT8 columns and UINT8 columns. We should simply be opinionated here and after discussion it was decided to use UINT8.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: