Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GUI: Icon/Logo quality and scaling issues #203

Closed
rakhimov opened this issue Jun 10, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

GUI: Icon/Logo quality and scaling issues #203

rakhimov opened this issue Jun 10, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@rakhimov
Copy link
Owner

The current logo and icons do not render or look well on links and embedded images.
The aspect ratio of the icon is ad-hoc and incompatible with the ones the platforms expect.
Windows scales down the icons to complete mess and unrecognizable pixel gibberish
probably due to the original logo itself using pixel metaphor with circles.

@rakhimov rakhimov added this to the v0.14.0: Initial GUI milestone Jun 11, 2017
rakhimov added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 24, 2018
The SCRAM logo is simplified and modernized
thanks to the inspired work by Nikash Singh (http://nikashsingh.org/):
"... I've abstracted the previously square nodes
which were structured and ordered in a matrix grid
to form the name "Scram" in the old logo
into a frenetic array of "escaping" energy."

Unlike the initial logo,
the new logo should serve much better
for icons and small resolution images.

Issue #203
rakhimov added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 24, 2018
The SCRAM logo is simplified and modernized
thanks to the inspired work by Nikash Singh (http://nikashsingh.org/):
"... I've abstracted the previously square nodes
which were structured and ordered in a matrix grid
to form the name "Scram" in the old logo
into a frenetic array of "escaping" energy."

Unlike the initial logo,
the new logo should serve much better
for icons and small resolution images.

Issue #203
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant