Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify nodeModules loader in CHANGELOG.md #1893

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

oleksii-leonov
Copy link
Contributor

New nodeModules loader significantly change behavior.
It's specified in Breaking changes section but description is quite small.

As example, @javan have issue with nodeModules loader (#1892). Also, in my build it breaks mapbox-gl package (mapbox/mapbox-gl-js#3422).

This PR adds more details to CHANGELOG.md about nodeModules loader and receipt to keep previous behavior.

New `nodeModules` loader significantly change behavior.
It's specified in **Breaking changes** section but description is quite small.

As example, @javan have issue with `nodeModules` loader (rails#1892). Also, in my build it breaks `mapbox-gl` package (mapbox/mapbox-gl-js#3422).

This PR adds more details to `CHANGELOG.md` about `nodeModules` loader and receipt to keep previous behavior.
@javan javan closed this in c73dd7a Jan 17, 2019
@oleksii-leonov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ouch, @javan issue has other reasons :)
But still, using nodeModules with default config breaks mapbox-gl package.

So, I believe adding proposed description about nodeModules and way to keep old behavior would be useful.

@jakeNiemiec
Copy link
Member

jakeNiemiec commented Feb 18, 2019

image

@gauravtiwari @javan Please consider taking another look at this one. #1949

@gauravtiwari
Copy link
Member

Feel free to open a new PR please :)

@oleksii-leonov
Copy link
Contributor Author

oleksii-leonov commented Mar 3, 2019

@gauravtiwari
Ok :) Will be within an hour.

@oleksii-leonov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@gauravtiwari
Reopened as #1972.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants