Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 16, 2022. It is now read-only.

Issues: radiantearth/geo-ml-model-catalog

24 Open 8 Closed
24 Open 8 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Expand Usage Conditions change Involves change to existing spec
#43 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
1
Redundant format field in Model Runtime section change Involves change to existing spec discussion needed Requires further discussion/input before implementing
#42 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
1
Align code examples with STAC spec change Involves change to existing spec discussion needed Requires further discussion/input before implementing
#41 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Change link to url in Model Runtime section change Involves change to existing spec
#40 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Confusion in Model Runtime spec bug Inconsistency in the spec, or bug in tools effort: minor Relatively low level of effort required good first issue A good issue to start with if you are looking to contribute
#39 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Allow CommonMark in description field change Involves change to existing spec effort: minor Relatively low level of effort required
#38 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Limit values for number_of_cores change Involves change to existing spec discussion needed Requires further discussion/input before implementing
#37 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Use enum for OS in environment change Involves change to existing spec effort: minor Relatively low level of effort required good first issue A good issue to start with if you are looking to contribute
#36 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Machine-readable dependencies change Involves change to existing spec discussion needed Requires further discussion/input before implementing
#35 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Use enum for programming language change Involves change to existing spec effort: minor Relatively low level of effort required good first issue A good issue to start with if you are looking to contribute
#34 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Use enum for input data type change Involves change to existing spec effort: minor Relatively low level of effort required good first issue A good issue to start with if you are looking to contribute
#33 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
1
Use GitHub citation file format for citation info change Involves change to existing spec discussion needed Requires further discussion/input before implementing
#32 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Use link for contact field change Involves change to existing spec discussion needed Requires further discussion/input before implementing
#31 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Should GMLMC be a STAC extension? change Involves change to existing spec
#30 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
7
Use STAC-like links where appropriate change Involves change to existing spec discussion needed Requires further discussion/input before implementing
#29 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Inconsistent field prefixes change Involves change to existing spec question Further information is requested
#28 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Change version to gmlmc_version change Involves change to existing spec good first issue A good issue to start with if you are looking to contribute
#27 opened Sep 7, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
Support for PyTorch checkpoints as serialization format addition Involves an addition to the spec discussion needed Requires further discussion/input before implementing
#26 opened Sep 2, 2021 by duckontheweb
@duckontheweb
2
First impressions change Involves change to existing spec
#25 opened Sep 1, 2021 by m-mohr
@duckontheweb
9
Add JSON schemas effort: major Requires substantial work prio: should-have Would be good to have in associated release
#24 opened May 17, 2021 by duckontheweb v0.2.0
Add examples addition Involves an addition to the spec effort: major Requires substantial work help wanted Looking for someone to contribute prio: should-have Would be good to have in associated release
#23 opened May 17, 2021 by duckontheweb v0.2.0
Add input data properties to Usage Recommendations change Involves change to existing spec discussion needed Requires further discussion/input before implementing
#22 opened May 17, 2021 by duckontheweb v0.2.0
@duckontheweb
Model types change Involves change to existing spec discussion needed Requires further discussion/input before implementing
#12 opened Apr 7, 2021 by duckontheweb v0.2.0
@duckontheweb
4
Globally unique model_id field change Involves change to existing spec discussion needed Requires further discussion/input before implementing
#8 opened Apr 5, 2021 by duckontheweb v0.2.0
@duckontheweb
1
ProTip! Add no:assignee to see everything that’s not assigned.