-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
License Question: Which one was used by this project, GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later #464
Labels
Comments
I have just added an explicit SPDX license identifier |
Thank you! |
ivandi69
pushed a commit
to ivandi69/qucs_s
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2024
ivandi69
pushed a commit
to ivandi69/qucs_s
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2024
ivandi69
pushed a commit
to ivandi69/qucs_s
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2024
ivandi69
pushed a commit
to ivandi69/qucs_s
that referenced
this issue
Jan 17, 2024
ivandi69
pushed a commit
to ivandi69/qucs_s
that referenced
this issue
Jan 18, 2024
ivandi69
pushed a commit
to ivandi69/qucs_s
that referenced
this issue
Jan 20, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I maintain the package of this project in archlinuxcn. Recently, Arch Linux enforced using the SPDX identifier via RFC161. It differs from GPL-2.0-only and GPL-2.0-or-later. So I need to know which one was used in this project.
Thank You!
Footnotes
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/blob/master/rfcs/0016-spdx-license-identifiers.rst ↩
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: