Receiving != data sender

[LPardue]

From the intro

Similarly, receiving and processing UDP packets can also be CPU intensive, and reducing acknowledgement frequency reduces this cost at a data sender.

I think this should be data receiver?

[mirjak]

No I believe data sender is correct but I guess the scenarios is not really clear here as this is probably only true if data is only flowing in one direction. In this case the data sender keeps sending the same amount of data independent of the ACK frequency, thus the data receiver has always the same load in receiving UDP packets. However, if the data receiver sends less ACK frames the data sender will receive less UDP packets.

[mirjak]

I created PR #265. Does it help?