add cmake build support

[madmongo1]

Hi there,

I am finding wise_enum very useful but we have standardised on cmake and hunter as a build system and dependency manager.

In order to make that seamless, it's helpful to build a standard cmake script which supports installing the product and the config files.

This PR addresses only this. No code as been changed.

[madmongo1]

removed all the clion project files

[quicknir]

Pretty strange that this is here, is this an accident?

[madmongo1]

probably my IDE doing some whitespace shenanigans.

[quicknir]

No, I mean the whole license. The code already has a license, there isn't really a need to have another, nor lists of authors, nor companies.

[quicknir]

@madmongo1 can you clarify for me, which version of cmake are you targeting?

Sorry for the delay reviewing, I'll keep it speedy from here out.

[madmongo1]

Hi there, I use very recent cmake (3.13 or 3.14). I can't imagine why anyone would use an older one.

…

On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 05:15, Nir Friedman ***@***.***> wrote: @madmongo1 <https://github.com/madmongo1> can you clarify for me, which version of cmake are you targeting? Sorry for the delay reviewing, I'll keep it speedy from here out. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#23 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHOZSNSHAAUZ65M6BDKXNDPTEDNDANCNFSM4HG2PU5Q> .

-- Richard Hodges [email protected] office: +442032898513 home: +376841522 mobile: +376380212

[madmongo1]

That part of the code was taken from Ruslo's example which contains his copyright. I did the work while being paid by Quoine corp, so feel obligated to put their name on it. What you do is up to you.

…

On Wed, 1 May 2019 at 16:25, Nir Friedman ***@***.***> wrote: ***@***.**** commented on this pull request. ------------------------------ In cmake/Config.cmake.in <#23 (comment)>: > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ + No, I mean the whole license. The code already has a license, there isn't really a need to have another, nor lists of authors, nor companies. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#23 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHOZSKGCDBDUEKKZDLS2G3PTGR6BANCNFSM4HG2PU5Q> .

-- Richard Hodges [email protected] office: +442032898513 home: +376841522 mobile: +376380212

[quicknir]

@madmongo1 can you clarify; you are ok with me taking the PR without the license/authorship list, or not? It wasn't clear to me from your comment.

[madmongo1]

I think in this case the code is trivial enough that it can be removed. Please go ahead and remove the license and authorship

…

On Thu, 2 May 2019 at 00:05, Nir Friedman ***@***.***> wrote: @madmongo1 <https://github.com/madmongo1> can you clarify; you are ok with me taking the PR without the license/authorship list, or not? It wasn't clear to me from your comment. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#23 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABHOZSPJJF3ZBJMJMQLVTVTPTIH4HANCNFSM4HG2PU5Q> .

-- Richard Hodges [email protected] office: +442032898513 home: +376841522 mobile: +376380212

[quicknir]

Closed in favor of #24