You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
GitHub has recognized qmd as an alternative name for RMarkdown for two years (Since github-linguist/linguist#5518), but considering the spread of qmd and the newly introduced syntax since then, I think it would be better to separate it and make qmd independent Quarto Markdown.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mcanouil
added
enhancement
New feature or request
triaged-to
Issues that were not self-assigned, signals that an issue was assigned to someone.
needs-discussion
Issues that require a team-wide discussion before proceeding further
and removed
triaged-to
Issues that were not self-assigned, signals that an issue was assigned to someone.
labels
Oct 31, 2023
The benefits is mostly for AI and in general for Quarto documents discoverability.
Right now, Quarto is not distinguishable from Rmarkdown for users and AI such as Copilot on GitHub.
Also Quarto is already very different from rmarkdown so the question is why state they are alike on GitHub?
Discussed in #7173
Originally posted by eitsupi October 8, 2023
Description
GitHub has recognized
qmd
as an alternative name for RMarkdown for two years (Since github-linguist/linguist#5518), but considering the spread ofqmd
and the newly introduced syntax since then, I think it would be better to separate it and makeqmd
independent Quarto Markdown.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: