-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add convenience methods mirroring ReflectiveClassBuildItem factory methods #38679
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
+1 for the new methods. My only "worry" here is about backporting. If we do intend to backport this (and I don't see why not), then +1 for all the changes. |
I did wonder about this. Let me know and I'll revert the build steps changes. |
Another change that could also be made would be to deprecate the constructors, similarly to what was done for ReflectiveClassBuildItem. |
Let's do the following:
In this PR introduce only the new methods.
A follow up PR can change the call sites and also deprecate the
constructors.
That way we'll have the flexibility to decide later on
…On Fri, Feb 9, 2024, 08:56 Chris Laprun ***@***.***> wrote:
Another change that could also be made would be to deprecate the
constructors, similarly to what was done for ReflectiveClassBuildItem.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#38679 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABBMDP44SQQTA35IHHA4K73YSXCBBAVCNFSM6AAAAABC7WQKPKVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSMZVGQZDCNZZHE>
.
You are receiving this because your review was requested.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
…thods Revert changes to call sites Add convenience methods mirroring ReflectiveClassBuildItem factory methods
Removed the call sites changes, added javadoc, chained factory methods for better maintenance. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Status for workflow
|
No description provided.