KOGITO-5560 remove 'preview'label from community website

[tarilabs]

Draft as pending Kogito upstream PR first: https://github.com/kiegroup/kogito-runtimes/pull/1462

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/KOGITO-5560

[gsmet]

I don't think it makes sense to backport it past 2.0 as the older versions are using older versions of Kogito, so I suppose versions that should be considered preview still.

[tarilabs]

We have Kogito runtime components from RHDM/RHPAM v7.11, which translates afaik to RHBQ equivalent of Quarkus-1.11, so I believe backport to Quarkus 1.11 inclusive, is indeed meaningful.

(
that's would have been the ~equivalent of

1.11 https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/18905
1.12 https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/18906
1.13 https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/18907
2.0 https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/18909
2.1 https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/pull/18910

)

[gsmet]

Well, you will need a Quarkus Platform release to push the latest Kogito bits. I have no idea what's planned for this. I can mark it for backport but I have no idea if a new 1.11 will be released.

What's for sure is that we won't release any new 1.12 or 1.13.

[tarilabs]

#18904 (comment) this is a bit beyond my radar, the intent here was actually to reflect the website guide, not code. I will follow-up in due time with the Kogito leads.

[danielezonca]

@tarilabs
Thanks for the PR, I agree with @gsmet that main should be enough

@gsmet
Thanks for tracking it as possible backport for 1.11 but it should not be a big deal even if it will not be backported 👍

[tarilabs]

/cc @evacchi

[tarilabs]

This PR marked as ready following merge event on https://github.com/kiegroup/kogito-runtimes/pull/1462#event-5085007428

[gsmet]

@tarilabs just a note that the preview status has been added to the other guides you all created. Not sure if it should be dropped or not?

[tarilabs]

@gsmet you right, prediction and rule was missing to remove the Preview label, but AFAIK decision did not have Preview.

[tarilabs]

I have included comment in the related PRs with your spotting, thanks @gsmet