Hibernate Reactive thread model fixes #17728
Conversation
|
Why didn't you implement out |
|
I guess I could, but why would it be better than this? |
|
Well ... try it? From a superficial look at your code, I would say it probably would be simpler, but I can't be sure without trying. |
|
Also, do we already have a configurable timeout for HR in Quarkus? |
|
A what? |
|
A timeout for waiting for a DB response. |
no we don't have timeouts |
|
I would not think that HR would be the right layer to do something like that. |
FroMage
force-pushed
the
hr-panache-thread-fix
branch
from
84dc7c3 to
19c0d75
Compare
quarkus-bot
bot
added
the
area/dependencies
FroMage
force-pushed
the
hr-panache-thread-fix
branch
from
19c0d75 to
e2e9de5
Compare
|
OK, this time I've added the missing |
|
@FroMage is there anything you want me to check WRT the PR? |
|
Yeah, changes in the test-framework from a69fb12 Do you want me to extract them to their own commit? I've added some functions, and made sure that the |
No need
👍🏼
very good idea, this is much better than what I had!
Not a thing of beauty for sure, but let's not get hung up on this detail as this PR should significantly improve the user experience |
|
CI is all green 🎉 |
|
I think we should just merge this ASAP, because the API differences are breaking, so it needs to be in 2.0. Even if the way we store the session/transaction changes in the future, the API should be the same. Besides, it fixes real issues, so it's just better than what we have ATM. |
|
You have my vote, but I'll leave it up to the folks tagged as reviewers |
hum I see two problems with this statement :/
Could you elaborate on why? |
Ah.
Yes, since obtaining the session is now async, all operations that require it are async. |
yea I can see that you implement this by getting a Session first, but if you don't have a session we shouldn't need to open one just for this check, right? Which implies you don't need to change the signature. I mean, conceptually this method doesn't need to run any async IO operation - we should be able to return the |
FroMage
force-pushed
the
hr-panache-thread-fix
branch
from
e2e9de5 to
2551acd
Compare
|
OK done. |
|
Ah, lemme check the docs. |
|
Hah, the docs were wrong, so they're now correct by accident :) Brilliant! |
|
Failure is not related: 2021-06-25T16:15:43.7464154Z Caused by: io.fabric8.maven.docker.access.hc.http.HttpRequestException: {"message":"Head https://registry-1.docker.io/v2/neo4j/neo4j-experimental/manifests/4.0.0-rc01: unknown: unable to scan account service mfa settings row from query: context deadline exceeded"} (Internal Server Error: 500) |
Failing Jobs - Building 2551acd
Full information is available in the Build summary check run. Test Failures⚙️ Maven Tests - JDK 11 #📦 integration-tests/maven✖ |
|
So is this good to go? |
|
it probably is - I had asked @DavideD to play a bit more with it but I guess we can also choose to play with it after it's integrated. |
|
Up to you obviously. Just want to mention that with |
|
I don't know what I have to do to get a review 🤷 |
|
Hi a short question. Did you try to use hot reload while using withSession and withTransaction. We implemented an interceptor similar to ReactiveTransactionalInterceptor and in our case a hot reload destroy something, when using one of the named methods. It fails with: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Type specified for TypedQuery [....entity.Agent] is incompatible with query return type [class ....entity.Agent]
at org.hibernate.internal.AbstractSharedSessionContract.resultClassChecking(AbstractSharedSessionContract.java:878) ~[hibernate-core-5.5.3.Final.jar:5.5.3.Final]
at org.hibernate.reactive.session.impl.ReactiveSessionImpl.createReactiveQuery(ReactiveSessionImpl.java:510) ~[hibernate-reactive-core-1.0.0.CR7.jar:1.0.0.CR7]
at org.hibernate.reactive.session.impl.ReactiveSessionImpl.buildReactiveQueryFromName(ReactiveSessionImpl.java:487) ~[hibernate-reactive-core-1.0.0.CR7.jar:1.0.0.CR7]
at org.hibernate.reactive.session.impl.ReactiveSessionImpl.createReactiveNamedQuery(ReactiveSessionImpl.java:472) ~[hibernate-reactive-core-1.0.0.CR7.jar:1.0.0.CR7]
at org.hibernate.reactive.mutiny.impl.MutinySessionImpl.createNamedQuery(MutinySessionImpl.java:251) ~[hibernate-reactive-core-1.0.0.CR7.jar:1.0.0.CR7]
...
at io.quarkus.arc.impl.AroundInvokeInvocationContext.proceed(AroundInvokeInvocationContext.java:54) ~[arc-2.0.0.Final.jar:2.0.0.Final]
at io.quarkus.arc.runtime.devconsole.InvocationInterceptor.proceed(InvocationInterceptor.java:62) ~[quarkus-arc-2.0.0.Final.jar:?]
at io.quarkus.arc.runtime.devconsole.InvocationInterceptor.monitor(InvocationInterceptor.java:49) ~[quarkus-arc-2.0.0.Final.jar:?]
at io.quarkus.arc.runtime.devconsole.InvocationInterceptor_Bean.intercept(InvocationInterceptor_Bean.zig:521) ~[quarkus:/:?]
at io.quarkus.arc.impl.InterceptorInvocation.invoke(InterceptorInvocation.java:41) ~[arc-2.0.0.Final.jar:2.0.0.Final]
at io.quarkus.arc.impl.AroundInvokeInvocationContext.perform(AroundInvokeInvocationContext.java:41) ~[arc-2.0.0.Final.jar:2.0.0.Final]
at io.quarkus.arc.impl.InvocationContexts.performAroundInvoke(InvocationContexts.java:32) ~[arc-2.0.0.Final.jar:2.0.0.Final]in general context information seems to be broken after hot reload in this case. E.g. SecurityContext crashes with NullpointerException while accessing context and some metrics which we registered at startup are also not available afterwards. We switched to withSession and withTransaction because of this issue: and here the suggestion to switch to mentioned methods: We did not create an issue for this yet. But it would be great if you could check if you face similar issues in your pr. |
|
There is a very good chance the testing stuff introduced in this PR will start having conflicts soon. For that reason and because this stuff seems to be important for the user experience (not to mention there is plenty of time to iron out whatever small issues it might have), a review would be much appreciated |
|
@geoand & @FroMage sorry I was off the last 2 days - catching up soon. Tangentially, but this happened other times as well.. and I'm sorry but I'm often dragged into urgent matters related to Hibernate, we should try to grow more people able to review Panache PRs as I can't be the one you need to wait for. @holomekc I've noticed the same and can reproduce it without Panache as well. I've just opened #18299 |
Yeah, that is totally understood :) |
| } | ||
| ---- | ||
|
|
||
| TIP: If you don't want to bother defining getters/setters for your entities, you can make them extend `PanacheEntityBase` and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I didn't know :)
But what is the goal? Can't we allow users to not use getters and setters at all?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We can, but by making sure everything goes via property accessors, we guarantee that they can turn the model classes from a field to a property in a backward compatible way. Not sure it's that useful in practice.
| - `set? <update-query>` will expand to `update from EntityName set <update-query>` | ||
|
|
||
| NOTE: You can also write your queries in plain | ||
| link:https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/5.4/userguide/html_single/Hibernate_User_Guide.html#hql[HQL]: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
no biggie, but we switched to ORM 5.5
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah, probably doesn't change much.
| PanacheQuery<PersonName> query = Person.find("status", Status.Alive).project(PersonName.class); | ||
| ---- | ||
|
|
||
| 1. The `@RegisterForReflection` annotation instructs Quarkus to keep the class and its members during the native compilation. More details about the `@RegisterForReflection` annotation can be found on the xref:writing-native-applications-tips.adoc#registerForReflection[native application tips] page. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
humm I really don't like that people have to "manually" use the annotation. It was created as a "we don't have time to fix things properly today" band-aid, but it seems we're suggesting its usage more and more.
Could you possibly look at making this unnecessary? We don't require it for any other Hibernate project.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well, this is only for cases where we do a projection, and since the projection class is not annotated with anything, we can't piggy-back on that annotation to detect it. We sould scan for calls to the .project(Class) method, now that jandex indexes use-sites, but, not sure it's worth it, this is pretty rare, non?
|
|
||
| 1. The `@RegisterForReflection` annotation instructs Quarkus to keep the class and its members during the native compilation. More details about the `@RegisterForReflection` annotation can be found on the xref:writing-native-applications-tips.adoc#registerForReflection[native application tips] page. | ||
| 2. We use public fields here, but you can use private fields and getters/setters if you prefer. | ||
| 3. This constructor will be used by Hibernate, it must be the only constructor in your class and have all the class attributes as parameters. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are you sure it must be "the only constructor" ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure. https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/orm/5.5/userguide/html_single/Hibernate_User_Guide.html#hql-select-clause says "The projection class must be fully qualified in the entity query, and it must define a matching constructor." Perhaps we can clarify this.
| reluctantly deal with, such as: | ||
|
|
||
| - Duplicating ID logic: most entities need an ID, most people don't care how it's set, because it's not really | ||
| relevant to your model. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I realy don't agree, but ... ok well your choice.
|
|
||
| Hibernate Reactive with Panache relies on compile-time bytecode enhancements to your entities. | ||
|
|
||
| It attempts to identity archives with Panache entities (and consumers of Panache entities) |
| if (Vertx.currentContext() == context) { | ||
| runnable.run(); | ||
| } else { | ||
| // this needs to be sync |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Didn't you already check that this is not running on a vertx thread?
| if (io.vertx.core.Context.isOnVertxThread()) { | ||
| return Uni.createFrom().item(Arc.container().instance(Mutiny.Session.class).get()); | ||
| } else { | ||
| // FIXME: we may need context propagation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you elaborate on what could be missing here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Well context propagation, using MP-CP, but I'd rather delay that until someone reports it.
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| private static boolean isInRequestContext(Class<?> klass) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This makes me sad, is there no efficient way to check if a bean already exists in the currenct context, without needing to go through all these hoops?
I was hoping there was something like Map.contains( key )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(it's of course an orthogonal issue we can address later)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
BTW I was exploring some alternatives here but got in deep trouble with bytecode ... that's what the zulip thread is about.
|
Many thanks @FroMage ! merged it |
|
Question @FroMage - do you know if the |
|
It will almost certainly not, it's too big of a change |
|
Thanks @geoand |
|
With this in, I assume we can start looking into supporting Kotlin Coroutines with Hibernate Reactive Panache (cc @evanchooly)? |
|
That's the plan, yes. |
Mutiny.Session Panache.getSessiontoUni<Mutiny.Session> Panache.getSessionboolean PanacheEntity.isPersistenttoUni<Boolean> PanacheEntity.isPersistent@ReactiveTransactionto forward toMutiny.Session.withTransaction: method must return aUnior be invoked from a non-VertxThread(in which case it blocks)Mutiny.Sessionobjects from the right threadsMutiny.Sessionand not the Vert.x context one used byMutiny.Session.withSessionPanache.currentTransactionwhich forwards toMutiny.Session.currentTransaction@Sanne @gavinking this should resolve the issues we've been having, right?