-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve pom.xml changes in remote dev mode #12969
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, but I would like @cescoffier to take a look as well
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
2 minors comments.
}, false, new Handler<AsyncResult<Object>>() { | ||
@Override | ||
public void handle(AsyncResult<Object> event) { | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe you can put null
and not implement this handler (to be tested).
}); | ||
}, new Handler<AsyncResult<Object>>() { | ||
@Override | ||
public void handle(AsyncResult<Object> event) { | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same, could be null
I believe.
What about ordering? Do we need to preserve it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ordering does not matter.
Fixes a few issues:
Fixes #12497