Move to new s2i native images introduced in Quarkus 2.14

[michalvavrik]

Summary

Move to new builder images introduced in Quarkus 2.14

PR with the change - quarkusio/quarkus#27997

NEW is active - https://quay.io/quarkus/ubi-quarkus-native-binary-s2i
OLD is without update for 3 months - https://quay.io/quarkus/ubi-quarkus-native-s2i

Please check the relevant options

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Dependency update
• Refactoring
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• This change requires a documentation update
• This change requires execution against OCP (use run tests phrase in comment)

Checklist:

• Example scenarios has been updated / added
• Methods and classes used in PR scenarios are meaningful
• Commits are well encapsulated and follow the best practices

[michalvavrik]

run tests

[michalvavrik]

I'll check OpenShiftS2iQuickstartUsingDefaultsIT.

[michalvavrik]

run tests

[michalvavrik]

I created quarkusio/quarkus#30829 for OpenShiftS2iQuickstartUsingDefaultsIT as I wasted loads of time on it and still don't have a clue where is the issue.

[michalvavrik]

run tests

[michalvavrik]

We won't upgrade s2i native image till upstream issue is resolved @fedinskiy .

[rsvoboda]

So this PR is on hold?

[michalvavrik]

No, I dropped changes in OpenShiftS2iGitRepositoryQuarkusApplicationManagedResource and now CI will pass, so once someone reviews it, it can be merged.

[michalvavrik]

@rsvoboda ^^^

[rsvoboda]

How do you plan to track the need to update OpenShiftS2iGitRepositoryQuarkusApplicationManagedResource ?

[michalvavrik]

I'll know when issue is closed, tbh I expected imminent response but that was too optimistic. I can add a note though.. It means to wait for CI again, but I'll do that.

[rsvoboda]

+1 to add TODO note

[rsvoboda]

hm, OCP native run failed :/

[michalvavrik]

added note

hm, OCP native run failed :/

native run number 245 is still running (I tested it locally too) and jvm run number 267 succeeded

[michalvavrik]

245 succeeded