Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Move JaegerContainer to 1.41.0, sync the version with other places #654

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2023
Merged

Move JaegerContainer to 1.41.0, sync the version with other places #654

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 18, 2023

Conversation

rsvoboda
Copy link
Member

Move JaegerContainer to 1.41.0, sync the version with other places
Please check the relevant options

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Dependency update
  • Refactoring
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • This change requires execution against OCP (use run tests phrase in comment)

Checklist:

  • Example scenarios has been updated / added
  • Methods and classes used in PR scenarios are meaningful
  • Commits are well encapsulated and follow the best practices

@rsvoboda rsvoboda requested a review from mjurc January 18, 2023 11:51
mjurc
mjurc approved these changes Jan 18, 2023
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@mjurc mjurc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@mjurc mjurc merged commit 1b70496 into quarkus-qe:main Jan 18, 2023
@michalvavrik michalvavrik mentioned this pull request Feb 8, 2023
Merged
11 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mjurc mjurc mjurc approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@rsvoboda @mjurc