Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate VLK_TOG for VK_TOGG #18807

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2022
Merged

Deprecate VLK_TOG for VK_TOGG #18807

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 22, 2022

Conversation

fauxpark
Copy link
Member

Description

More keycode normalisation.

Types of Changes

  • Core
  • Bugfix
  • New feature
  • Enhancement/optimization
  • Keyboard (addition or update)
  • Keymap/layout/userspace (addition or update)
  • Documentation

Issues Fixed or Closed by This PR

Checklist

  • My code follows the code style of this project: C, Python
  • I have read the PR Checklist document and have made the appropriate changes.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

@fauxpark fauxpark added enhancement core keymap documentation via Adds via keymap and/or updates keyboard for via support labels Oct 22, 2022
@fauxpark fauxpark requested a review from a team October 22, 2022 03:45
@drashna drashna requested a review from a team October 22, 2022 18:41
@zvecr zvecr merged commit 74484e2 into qmk:develop Oct 22, 2022
@fauxpark fauxpark deleted the deprecate-vlk-tog branch October 23, 2022 02:57
ramonimbao pushed a commit to ramonimbao/qmk_firmware that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
core documentation enhancement keymap via Adds via keymap and/or updates keyboard for via support
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants