Rebase usb host based on hasu's fork and corresponding changes to usb_usb

[milestogo]

Description

Delete out of date usb host shield 2.0 library, and submodule the master branch of Hasu's port. Hasu has been doing a lot of work to better detect HID devices. I have two keyboards that are not recognized without these changes.

I did not update the arduino library, and left changes to the serial library overrides commented out.

The rest is diffed from the current TMK usb_usb files, keeping QMK debugging & making changes to use usbhid.x instead of hid.x .

Tested on a hasu usb_usb device with a TEK cleave keyboard (badly behaved), and several QMK keyboards (well behaved).

I've never created submodules before, so that's likely to be wrong.

Fauxpark didn't take this approach in #13973 , there may be good reasons

Types of Changes

• Core
• Bugfix
• New feature
• Enhancement/optimization
• Keyboard (addition or update)
• Keymap/layout/userspace (addition or update)
• Documentation

Issues Fixed or Closed by This PR

• backport of code used in current TMK.

Checklist

• [x ] My code follows the code style of this project: [C]
• [ x] I have read the [PR Checklist document]
• My change requires a change to the documentation.
• I have updated the documentation accordingly.
• [ x] I have read the [CONTRIBUTING document]
• I have added tests to cover my changes.
• [x ] I have tested the changes and verified that they work and don't break anything (as well as I can manage).

[zvecr]

The long term plans are to remove all the arduino code, including the host shield lib. The main reason is its rather bodged in, working on limited MCUs and conflicting with various parts of the QMK codebase.

The intention is to introduce drivers based on spi_master, to provide a better integration.

[drashna]

Why not just:

Suggested change

	path = lib/usbhost/USB_Host_Shield_2.0
	path = lib/USB_Host_Shield_2.0

[milestogo]

Since this is a library/core feature, I'm going to need core maintainers to figure out what happens next.

[stale]

Thank you for your contribution!
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had activity in the last 45 days. It will be closed in 30 days if no further activity occurs. Please feel free to give a status update now, or re-open when it's ready.
For maintainers: Please label with awaiting review, breaking_change, in progress, or on hold to prevent the issue from being re-flagged.

[tzarc]

Unsure what the status is, but it looks like there's a longer-term direction at play here.
Swapping about the labels so stalebot doesn't close it.