Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix power() in subclass test for QuantumCircuit change (backport #172) #174

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 6, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented May 6, 2024

Summary

Qiskit tests against main have been failing lint recently due to power() in QuantumCircuit gaining an extra parameter. With 1.1 going live shortly, where it will become the stable version tested against here, this amends the test to work and pass lint for existing versions of Qiskit e.g 0.46 and 1.0 as well as 1.1

Details and comments

As it's just a test case fix there is no reno needed. I marked this for backporting to stable as it will affect any builds done there once 1.1 releases.


This is an automatic backport of pull request #172 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

@mergify mergify bot requested review from Cryoris, woodsp-ibm and ElePT as code owners May 6, 2024 06:43
@ElePT ElePT added the automerge label May 6, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 8965115888

Details

  • 1 of 1 (100.0%) changed or added relevant line in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 90.653%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 8635185179: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 6488
Relevant Lines: 7157

💛 - Coveralls

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 040e9af into stable/0.3 May 6, 2024
19 checks passed
@mergify mergify bot deleted the mergify/bp/stable/0.3/pr-172 branch May 6, 2024 07:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants