Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Example of script syntax to run RB #953

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Example of script syntax to run RB #953

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

andrea-pasquale
Copy link
Contributor

Here is an example on how to run RB with the script syntax.
I'm running a super short RB changing the amplitude of the pi pulse.
Here are the two reports that are generated after the execution:
http://login.qrccluster.com:9000/nstuLkrSTXe_INZTUnaIjA==
http://login.qrccluster.com:9000/otZWGds9Qi6coougeOVEVQ==

It seems to work as expected.
I believe that you can already start playing with this @wilkensJ.

For any plots or post-processing which involve multiple protocols for time being feel free to dump custom data and use custom plotting functions on top of that.

Let me know if anything is not clear.

@andrea-pasquale andrea-pasquale added the experiment Related to an individual protocol label Jul 30, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.52%. Comparing base (f8c04db) to head (6763e0f).
Report is 192 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #953   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.52%   97.52%           
=======================================
  Files         118      118           
  Lines        9056     9056           
=======================================
  Hits         8832     8832           
  Misses        224      224           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.52% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

@andrea-pasquale
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #975

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
experiment Related to an individual protocol
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants