Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add reference to anomaly detection example #877

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 3, 2023

Conversation

Simone-Bordoni
Copy link
Contributor

As the article regarding quantum anomaly detection, on which this example is based, has been published i have added the reference at the beginning.

As the article regarding quantum anomaly detection, on which this example is based, has been published i have added the reference at the beginning.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 3, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch and project coverage have no change.

Comparison is base (750aee3) 100.00% compared to head (9abadd0) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #877   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           48        48           
  Lines         6372      6372           
=========================================
  Hits          6372      6372           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@scarrazza scarrazza added this pull request to the merge queue May 3, 2023
Merged via the queue into master with commit 2582f46 May 3, 2023
@scarrazza scarrazza deleted the Add-reference-to-anomaly-detection-example branch May 25, 2023 07:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants