Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove useless stuff from pre_build_script #8532

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

NicolasHug
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Jul 17, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/8532

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

❌ 13 New Failures, 8 Pending, 15 Unrelated Failures

As of commit 1f57e9e with merge base e3d3ca0 (image):

NEW FAILURES - The following jobs have failed:

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@NicolasHug NicolasHug merged commit 3663024 into pytorch:main Jul 18, 2024
9 of 25 checks passed
@NicolasHug NicolasHug deleted the pre_build_script_cleanup branch July 18, 2024 08:24
Copy link

Hey @NicolasHug!

You merged this PR, but no labels were added.
The list of valid labels is available at https://github.com/pytorch/vision/blob/main/.github/process_commit.py

@NicolasHug NicolasHug added the other if you have no clue or if you will manually handle the PR in the release notes label Jul 18, 2024
facebook-github-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2024
Reviewed By: vmoens

Differential Revision: D60596217

fbshipit-source-id: 5a1ac9ecf139859fbeb307f7e56bfbfc12c2f22c
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla signed other if you have no clue or if you will manually handle the PR in the release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants