-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CUDNN][SDPA] Experimental cuDNN Flash Attention v2 Inference #115663
Conversation
🔗 Helpful Links🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/115663
Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed. ❌ 1 New Failure, 3 Unrelated FailuresAs of commit 4fc3337 with merge base 3ab0894 (): NEW FAILURE - The following job has failed:
BROKEN TRUNK - The following jobs failed but were present on the merge base:👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures
This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes. |
Also feel free to ping me when you think I should do a review |
@pytorchmergebot rebase |
@pytorchbot started a rebase job onto refs/remotes/origin/viable/strict. Check the current status here |
Successfully rebased |
fc7cf93
to
7a1e8d9
Compare
@drisspg sorry for the delay, I think this should be ready for review now |
@@ -21,6 +21,15 @@ class CuDNNError : public c10::Error { | |||
|
|||
} // namespace c10 | |||
|
|||
#define AT_CUDNN_FRONTEND_CHECK(EXPR, ...) \ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a result of frontend changing to 9.0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is kind of just the "new" way that cuDNN-frontend has been doing error reporting and this is done in recent frontend versions that are supported in 8.9.x. It is a bit annoying in that there is now a mechanism for getting an error string and it is different from the previous convention of "return CUDNN_STATUS_SUCCESS
."
aten/src/ATen/native/cudnn/MHA.cpp
Outdated
// .set_dim({b, 1, s_q, s_kv}) | ||
// .set_stride({s_q * s_kv, s_q * s_kv, s_kv, 1})); | ||
auto seed = mha_graph->tensor(fe::graph::Tensor_attributes() | ||
.set_name("Seed") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Another dumb Q: are these names meaningful? like do they need to match an api for calling the function?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not a dumb question! The names are potentially meaningful in the future in that we would be able to reference I/O tensors by name rather than by holding onto an explicit reference as we currently do to supply the "variant pack" (the map used to specify the data pointers for each I/O tensor upon invocation). In either case they do not really mean anything to cuDNN and rather are for the user's (us) housekeeping.
aten/src/ATen/native/cudnn/MHA.cpp
Outdated
if (cudnnGetVersion() >= 8904) { | ||
//scaled_dot_product_flash_attention_options.set_alibi_mask(true); | ||
} | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this only support certain bias types?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would need check with the cuDNN folks, this doc https://docs.nvidia.com/deeplearning/cudnn/developer-guide/index.html#flash-fused-multi-head-att-fprop doesn't seem to be very clear about this
aten/src/ATen/native/cudnn/MHA.cpp
Outdated
cudnnHandle_t handle = getCudnnHandle(); | ||
o = at::empty_strided({b, h, s_q, d}, {s_q * h * d, d, h * d, 1}, q.options()); | ||
if (return_softmaxstats) { | ||
// TODO(eqy): fix strides |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I assume this stride fix is only needed for backward support right? so is okay for this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this comment is out-of-date, but I should verify rather than fix the strides here
One other random question, if I wanted to play around with this early, is there any specific build options I should be using? And any specific version of cudnn I need to have? |
I don't think you would need any specific build options---cuDNN >= 8.9 would probably work best. The only other requirement should be cuDNN frontend 1.0, but that tag was updated in the |
@pytorchmergebot rebase |
Successfully rebased |
153620a
to
4fc3337
Compare
@drisspg has imported this pull request. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this diff on Phabricator. |
@pytorchbot merge -i Landed internally as D53716382 |
Merge startedYour change will be merged while ignoring the following 4 checks: periodic / buck-build-test / buck-build-test (default, 1, 1, ubuntu-latest), periodic / win-vs2019-cuda11.8-py3 / test (default, 2, 4, windows.g5.4xlarge.nvidia.gpu), periodic / linux-focal-rocm5.7-py3.8 / test (distributed, 2, 2, linux.rocm.gpu), periodic / linux-focal-cuda11.8-py3.9-gcc9 / test (multigpu, 1, 1, linux.g5.12xlarge.nvidia.gpu) Learn more about merging in the wiki. Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team |
We should probably update our cudnn binaries as most of the recent changes has been improving this flash attention kernal. |
#113713
Going to clean up some of the checks and will remove draft status after.
Can be tested on SM80+ with
TORCH_CUDNN_MHA_ENABLED=1
.CC @drisspg @ptrblck