Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add INT4-FP8 rowwise matmul tests #2622

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jiawenliu64
Copy link
Member

Summary:

  • Add INT4-FP8 rowwise matmul tests with cudagraph and eager
  • Change number of groups to group size to align with E2E variable

Differential Revision: D57677844

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57677844

Copy link

netlify bot commented May 22, 2024

Deploy Preview for pytorch-fbgemm-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d3c3b0f
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/pytorch-fbgemm-docs/deploys/664e4ed54ea6e9000852b9e7
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2622--pytorch-fbgemm-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Summary:

- Add INT4-FP8 rowwise matmul tests with cudagraph and eager
- Change number of groups to group size to align with E2E variable
- Fix a minor dtype issue

Differential Revision: D57677844
jiawenliu64 added a commit to jiawenliu64/FBGEMM that referenced this pull request May 22, 2024
Summary:

- Add INT4-FP8 rowwise matmul tests with cudagraph and eager
- Change number of groups to group size to align with E2E variable
- Fix a minor dtype issue

Differential Revision: D57677844
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57677844

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D57677844

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in 63ca6dc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants