Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ROCm version on CI pipeline to 5.6 and 5.7 #2066

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

spcyppt
Copy link
Contributor

@spcyppt spcyppt commented Oct 6, 2023

Summary:
PyTorch no longer releases ROCm 5.5 for nightly. The last nightly release was on 9/21/23. This will cause some tests to fail on CI if the diff relies on
torch's new changes after 9/21 (e.g., https://github.com/pytorch/FBGEMM/actions/runs/6398449444/job/17368614311)

Pytorch dev infra also supports ROCm 5.6 and 5.7 by default. This diff updates the ROCm version on FBGEMM CI to align with PyTorch.

Reviewed By: q10

Differential Revision: D49980627

Summary:
PyTorch no longer releases ROCm 5.5 for nightly. The last nightly release was on 9/21/23. This will cause some tests to fail on CI if the diff relies on
torch's new changes after 9/21 (e.g., https://github.com/pytorch/FBGEMM/actions/runs/6398449444/job/17368614311)

Pytorch dev infra also supports ROCm 5.6 and 5.7 by default. This diff updates the ROCm version on FBGEMM CI to align with PyTorch.

Reviewed By: q10

Differential Revision: D49980627
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 6, 2023

Deploy Preview for pytorch-fbgemm-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit db6107a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/pytorch-fbgemm-docs/deploys/651f5c2402d2d70008b3e546

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D49980627

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request has been merged in c22d85c.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants