Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Daily tests failed on Fri Feb 09 2024 #11383

Closed
github-actions bot opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #11384
Closed

Daily tests failed on Fri Feb 09 2024 #11383

github-actions bot opened this issue Feb 9, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #11384
Labels
help wanted An actionable problem of low to medium complexity where a PR would be very welcome

Comments

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2024

Runs listed here: https://github.com/python/typeshed/actions/workflows/daily.yml
@github-actions github-actions bot added the help wanted An actionable problem of low to medium complexity where a PR would be very welcome label Feb 9, 2024
@AlexWaygood
Copy link
Member

AlexWaygood commented Feb 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Stdlib stubtest errors due to the new patch releases of 3.11 and 3.12.

The __non_callable_proto_members__ ones on 3.12 just need to be allowlisted for now (should probably ignore them more systematically in stubtest). The asyncio one looks like it might be a true positive, though

This was referenced Feb 9, 2024
Merged
Merged
JelleZijlstra pushed a commit to python/mypy that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2024
@AlexWaygood
Stubtest: ignore a new protocol dunder (#16895)
517f5ae 
This is added to all protocol classes on Python 3.12.2+ (it was added in
a patch release of 3.12 as part of a bugfix). There's no reason why
you'd want to explicitly include it in a stub (and doing so would lead
the type checker to incorrectly conclude that you wanted a member
literally called `__non_callable_proto_members__`)

Cf. python/typeshed#11384 and
python/typeshed#11383
cdce8p pushed a commit to cdce8p/mypy that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2024
@AlexWaygood @cdce8p
Stubtest: ignore a new protocol dunder (python#16895)
4e77874 
This is added to all protocol classes on Python 3.12.2+ (it was added in
a patch release of 3.12 as part of a bugfix). There's no reason why
you'd want to explicitly include it in a stub (and doing so would lead
the type checker to incorrectly conclude that you wanted a member
literally called `__non_callable_proto_members__`)

Cf. python/typeshed#11384 and
python/typeshed#11383

(cherry picked from commit 517f5ae)
@cdce8p cdce8p mentioned this issue Feb 10, 2024
Merged
cdce8p pushed a commit to cdce8p/mypy that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2024
@AlexWaygood @cdce8p
Stubtest: ignore a new protocol dunder (python#16895)
e9c67db 
This is added to all protocol classes on Python 3.12.2+ (it was added in
a patch release of 3.12 as part of a bugfix). There's no reason why
you'd want to explicitly include it in a stub (and doing so would lead
the type checker to incorrectly conclude that you wanted a member
literally called `__non_callable_proto_members__`)

Cf. python/typeshed#11384 and
python/typeshed#11383

(cherry picked from commit 517f5ae)
JelleZijlstra pushed a commit to python/mypy that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2024
@cdce8p @AlexWaygood
[Release 1.9] Stubtest: ignore a new protocol dunder (#16895) (#16899)
6615cab 
This is added to all protocol classes on Python 3.12.2+ (it was added in
a patch release of 3.12 as part of a bugfix). There's no reason why
you'd want to explicitly include it in a stub (and doing so would lead
the type checker to incorrectly conclude that you wanted a member
literally called `__non_callable_proto_members__`)

Cf. python/typeshed#11384 and
python/typeshed#11383

(cherry picked from commit 517f5ae)

Co-authored-by: Alex Waygood <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
help wanted An actionable problem of low to medium complexity where a PR would be very welcome
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix stdlib stubtest for Python 3.11.8 and 3.12.2 AlexWaygood/typeshed
1 participant
@AlexWaygood