Doc: Make functions.html readable again. #99476
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rhettinger
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2022
|
Thanks @JulienPalard for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.11. |
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2022
(cherry picked from commit 858cb79) Co-authored-by: Julien Palard <[email protected]>
|
GH-99592 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch. |
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2022
(cherry picked from commit 858cb79) Co-authored-by: Julien Palard <[email protected]>
hauntsaninja
added a commit
to hauntsaninja/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2022
All the arguments are positional-only. The current status after python#99476 seems to be to not use positional-only markers in documentation (although there are still three others in this file). I asked for clarification in python#100546 (comment).
hauntsaninja
added a commit
to hauntsaninja/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 27, 2022
All the arguments are positional-only. The current status after python#99476 seems to be to not use positional-only markers in documentation, hence I've simply removed it. That said, there are still three other positional-only markers in this file). I asked for clarification in python#100546 (comment). See also python#98340
hauntsaninja
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2023
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2023
…ythonGH-100547) All the arguments are positional-only. The current status after pythonGH-99476 seems to be to not use positional-only markers in documentation, hence I've simply removed it. (cherry picked from commit 71159a8) Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
miss-islington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2023
All the arguments are positional-only. The current status after GH-99476 seems to be to not use positional-only markers in documentation, hence I've simply removed it. (cherry picked from commit 71159a8) Co-authored-by: Shantanu <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
closes #98340