Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[3.10] gh-95300: Clarify API stability of PyTypeObject in relation to static types. (GH-96217) #96267

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 25, 2022

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Aug 25, 2022

Fixes:
#95300

Related:
#91271
(cherry picked from commit caa2a97)

Co-authored-by: ov2k [email protected]

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ov2k and @encukou: Status check is done, and it's a failure ❌ .

@encukou encukou changed the title [3.10] Clarify API stability of PyTypeObject in relation to static types. (GH-96217) [3.10] gh-95300: Clarify API stability of PyTypeObject in relation to static types. (GH-96217) Aug 25, 2022
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 2f88289 into python:3.10 Aug 25, 2022
@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-caa2a97-3.10 branch August 25, 2022 13:42
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants