Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[3.8] bpo-39689: Do not use native packing for format "?" with standard size (GH-18969) #19155

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2020
Merged

[3.8] bpo-39689: Do not use native packing for format "?" with standard size (GH-18969) #19155

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2020

Conversation

miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

@miss-islington miss-islington commented Mar 25, 2020 •
edited by bedevere-bot
Loading

(cherry picked from commit 472fc84)

Co-authored-by: Stefan Krah [email protected]

https://bugs.python.org/issue39689

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2020
Merged
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

2 similar comments
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: 2 of 4 required status checks are expected..

@encukou encukou changed the title [3.8] bpo-39689: Do not use native packing for format "?" with standard size (GH-18969) [3.8] bpo-39689: Do not use native packing for format ? with standard size (GH-18969) Mar 31, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@encukou encukou changed the title [3.8] bpo-39689: Do not use native packing for format ? with standard size (GH-18969) [3.8] bpo-39689: Do not use native packing for format "?" with standard size (GH-18969) Mar 31, 2020
@miss-islington miss-islington merged commit 572ef74 into python:3.8 Mar 31, 2020
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, I can't merge this PR. Reason: Pull Request is not mergeable.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

@miss-islington miss-islington deleted the backport-472fc84-3.8 branch March 31, 2020 12:26
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor Author

@skrah: Status check is done, and it's a success ✅ .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@encukou encukou encukou approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip news
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
5 participants
@miss-islington @encukou @the-knights-who-say-ni @bedevere-bot @skrah