-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gh-101696: Make sure immutable types have a valid version tag #101742
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -229,6 +229,13 @@ _PyType_CheckConsistency(PyTypeObject *type) | |
CHECK(type->tp_traverse != NULL); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (_PyType_HasFeature(type, Py_TPFLAGS_VALID_VERSION_TAG)) { | ||
CHECK(type->tp_version_tag != 0); | ||
} | ||
else { | ||
CHECK(type->tp_version_tag == 0); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (type->tp_flags & Py_TPFLAGS_DISALLOW_INSTANTIATION) { | ||
CHECK(type->tp_new == NULL); | ||
CHECK(PyDict_Contains(type->tp_dict, &_Py_ID(__new__)) == 0); | ||
|
@@ -4469,8 +4476,6 @@ _PyStaticType_Dealloc(PyTypeObject *type) | |
} | ||
|
||
type->tp_flags &= ~Py_TPFLAGS_READY; | ||
type->tp_flags &= ~Py_TPFLAGS_VALID_VERSION_TAG; | ||
type->tp_version_tag = 0; | ||
|
||
if (type->tp_flags & _Py_TPFLAGS_STATIC_BUILTIN) { | ||
_PyStaticType_ClearWeakRefs(type); | ||
|
@@ -6971,6 +6976,12 @@ PyType_Ready(PyTypeObject *type) | |
type->tp_flags |= Py_TPFLAGS_IMMUTABLETYPE; | ||
} | ||
|
||
/* All immutable types must have a static valid version tag */ | ||
if (type->tp_flags & Py_TPFLAGS_IMMUTABLETYPE) { | ||
type->tp_version_tag = next_version_tag++; | ||
type->tp_flags |= Py_TPFLAGS_VALID_VERSION_TAG; | ||
} | ||
Comment on lines
+6979
to
+6983
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. tl;dr I'm on board with this. As I mentioned in gh-101696, this is good as it covers non-builtin static types (AKA non- FWIW, the already merged fix may fit a little better with the vague idea (in my head) that we should be special-casing static types in the runtime as little as possible (or otherwise in more explicit ways, like the dedicated Bottom line: dropping the original fix and adding the fix you have here is worth it since it handles non-builtin static types too. Footnotes
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Note that this PR does not special-case static types; the condition is for immutable types. |
||
|
||
if (type_ready(type) < 0) { | ||
type->tp_flags &= ~Py_TPFLAGS_READYING; | ||
return -1; | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This check is worth adding, regardless of the rest of this PR, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes