-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bring back link checks #12474
Comments
I reconsidered this, because now we have some scheduled jobs (like plugin update, pre-commit, etc) and history shows that they are not ignored, often sometimes takes time to fix them if they fail. So a scheduled job might do the trick here in the end. |
Hi @The-Compiler, I would like to look at it as my first issue. |
@ladislav987 please feel free to ask questions as you work through the issue or submit a draft PR right away, updating it as you work through stuff. |
Can I work on this? @The-Compiler |
@nikunjmathur08 See the comments right above yours, @ladislav987 has already offered to work on this a week ago. |
I read all about "link check" history. If I get it right you want use sphinx. Or you want try something else? |
This is about Sphinx. |
@The-Compiler just asked because there was no interaction for the past week. No issues if @ladislav987 is already working on it. |
We have quite some history when it comes to link checks:
So we're currently not running link checking at all. And it shows:
We should bring it back somehow. According to @webknjaz it got better at doing retries and such, and apparently there's also a distinct status for timeouts:
From @nicoddemus in #6916:
But what we currently have is worse IMHO...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: