Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document the new resolver #10247

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 3, 2022
Merged

Document the new resolver #10247

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 3, 2022

Conversation

pfmoore
Copy link
Member

@pfmoore pfmoore commented Jul 31, 2021

Very much work in progress at the moment. Mostly putting it here so I can see how it renders in RTD.

Fixes #10240.

that satisfy them. This is essentially where the finder interacts with the
resolver.
* `is_satisfied_by` - checks if a candidate satisfies a requirement. This is
basically the implementation of what a requirement meams.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
basically the implementation of what a requirement meams.
basically the implementation of what a requirement means.

@pfmoore pfmoore mentioned this pull request Sep 18, 2021
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs rebase or merge PR has conflicts with current master label Feb 26, 2022
@pradyunsg
Copy link
Member

@pfmoore How do feel about rebasing this, adding a "work in progress" admonition on top of the document and merging this?

@pfmoore
Copy link
Member Author

pfmoore commented Sep 30, 2022

Sounds like a reasonable idea. I'll try to get to it soon.

@pypa-bot pypa-bot removed the needs rebase or merge PR has conflicts with current master label Oct 2, 2022
@pfmoore pfmoore added the skip news Does not need a NEWS file entry (eg: trivial changes) label Oct 2, 2022
@pfmoore pfmoore marked this pull request as ready for review October 2, 2022 11:19
@pfmoore
Copy link
Member Author

pfmoore commented Oct 2, 2022

OK, I merged in main and resolved the conflict, and I added a note to the doc. I'll leave this a day or two and if no-one has any issues with it I'll merge it.

/cc @pradyunsg

@pfmoore pfmoore changed the title WIP: Document the new resolver Document the new resolver Oct 3, 2022
@pfmoore pfmoore merged commit 970b53d into pypa:main Oct 3, 2022
@pfmoore
Copy link
Member Author

pfmoore commented Oct 3, 2022

It's easy enough to revert or fix if anyone feels there's improvements to be made 🙂

@pfmoore pfmoore deleted the resolver_details branch October 3, 2022 10:14
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 19, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
skip news Does not need a NEWS file entry (eg: trivial changes)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Document the new resolver
4 participants