Use union of default and user provided configs in ModelBuilder

[ricardoV94]

Description

I don't see a good reason not to do this for the users?

Related Issue

• Closes #
• Related to #

Checklist

• Checked that the pre-commit linting/style checks pass
• Included tests that prove the fix is effective or that the new feature works
• Added necessary documentation (docstrings and/or example notebooks)
• If you are a pro: each commit corresponds to a relevant logical change

Modules affected

• MMM
• CLV

Type of change

• New feature / enhancement
• Bug fix
• Documentation
• Maintenance
• Other (please specify):

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pymc-marketing--565.org.readthedocs.build/en/565/

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[juanitorduz]

It makes a lot of sense 😅 . There are some test failing though ....

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.04%. Comparing base (4702408) to head (6c2dfb4).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #565   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.04%   91.04%           
=======================================
  Files          21       21           
  Lines        1999     1999           
=======================================
  Hits         1820     1820           
  Misses        179      179           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ricardoV94]

@juanitorduz tests are passing

[juanitorduz]

Ups!you are right! I don't know which CI I was looking then 🙈

[ricardoV94]

Ups!you are right! I don't know which CI I was looking then 🙈

You didn't imagine it. I had to fix a test

[juanitorduz]

Haha ok! Now everything makes sense 😄