Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pysqa: set default jobname to pysqa #483

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Nov 9, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a default job name for submissions, ensuring every job has a name even if not explicitly provided.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of job submissions by ensuring a consistent job name is assigned.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request modify the execute_with_pysqa function within the executorlib/standalone/cache/queue.py file. A default job name is added to the resource_dict dictionary, ensuring that if the "job_name" key is absent, it defaults to "pysqa". The remainder of the function's logic remains unchanged, and there are no alterations to the signatures of exported or public entities.

Changes

File Change Summary
executorlib/standalone/cache/queue.py Added a default job name to resource_dict in execute_with_pysqa function.

Possibly related PRs

  • Cache: Use absolute path for working directory #462: The changes in this PR also modify the execute_with_pysqa function in the same file, specifically addressing the handling of the working_directory, which is closely related to the overall functionality of job execution and resource management in the same context.

🐰 In the code where jobs do play,
A default name now leads the way.
If none is found, "pysqa" it’ll be,
A little change, so simple and free!
Hopping through functions, neat and bright,
Making sure our jobs take flight! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
executorlib/standalone/cache/queue.py (1)

Line range hint 14-31: Consider updating the function documentation.

The docstring should be updated to document the "job_name" parameter in the resource_dict example.

         resource_dict (dict): resource dictionary, which defines the resources used for the execution of the function.
                              Example resource dictionary: {
                                  cwd: None,
+                                 job_name: "pysqa",  # Optional, defaults to "pysqa"
                              }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d31907f and 8ed77d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • executorlib/standalone/cache/queue.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
executorlib/standalone/cache/queue.py (2)

60-61: LGTM! Default job name addition looks good.

The change provides a sensible default job name while maintaining backward compatibility.


60-61: Verify consistent job name handling across the codebase.

Let's ensure this default aligns with any other job name handling in the codebase.

✅ Verification successful

Default job name "pysqa" appears to be unique to this context

The default job name "pysqa" is only used in this specific location as a fallback value when no job name is provided. No other instances of job name handling or defaults were found in the codebase, suggesting this is a localized default that doesn't conflict with other implementations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other instances of job name handling to ensure consistency
rg -g '!*.pyc' -g '!*.git' 'job_name.*=.*pysqa' 
rg -g '!*.pyc' -g '!*.git' '"job_name".*:.*"pysqa"'

Length of output: 185


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search more broadly for job_name handling patterns
rg -g '!*.pyc' -g '!*.git' 'job_name' -A 2

# Also search for any configuration or default settings related to job names
fd -e yaml -e json -e ini -e conf -e toml | xargs rg 'job.*name' -A 2

Length of output: 432


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's look for the qa.submit_job implementation and its usage
ast-grep --pattern 'def submit_job'

# Also search for any test files that might show expected job name behavior
rg -g '*test*.py' 'job_name' -A 2

Length of output: 71

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit c8648ed into main Nov 9, 2024
26 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the pysqa_default_jobname branch November 9, 2024 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant