Rename Interface to Spawner #398
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@jan-janssen has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 5 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes involve a comprehensive refactoring of the executor library, transitioning from interface classes to spawner classes. This includes renaming and replacing Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Executor
participant Spawner
User->>Executor: Create Executor
Executor->>Spawner: Initialize Spawner
Spawner-->>Executor: Spawner Ready
Executor->>Spawner: Execute Task
Spawner-->>Executor: Task Completed
Executor-->>User: Return Result
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (13)
- executorlib/interactive/init.py (4 hunks)
- executorlib/interactive/executor.py (5 hunks)
- executorlib/interactive/flux.py (1 hunks)
- executorlib/shared/init.py (2 hunks)
- executorlib/shared/communication.py (2 hunks)
- executorlib/shared/executor.py (7 hunks)
- executorlib/shared/spawner.py (4 hunks)
- tests/test_executor_backend_flux.py (1 hunks)
- tests/test_flux_executor.py (9 hunks)
- tests/test_local_executor.py (27 hunks)
- tests/test_local_executor_future.py (5 hunks)
- tests/test_shared_backend.py (4 hunks)
- tests/test_shared_communication.py (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
tests/test_executor_backend_flux.py
11-11:
executorlib.interactive.flux.FluxPythonSpawnerimported but unused; consider usingimportlib.util.find_specto test for availability(F401)
executorlib/shared/spawner.py
9-9:
BaseSpawneris an abstract base class, but it has no abstract methods(B024)
Additional comments not posted (44)
executorlib/shared/__init__.py (1)
10-10: Imports and public interface updated correctly.The import statements and
__all__declaration have been updated to reflect the transition from interfaces to spawners, aligning with the PR objectives.The changes are approved as they correctly expose the new spawner classes.
Also applies to: 22-23
tests/test_executor_backend_flux.py (1)
11-11: Verify the usage ofFluxPythonSpawner.The import of
FluxPythonSpawnerreplacesFluxPythonInterface, aligning with the PR objectives. However, static analysis suggests it is unused. Verify its usage within the test functions or consider conditional imports if the module might not always be available.Consider using
importlib.util.find_specto conditionally importFluxPythonSpawneronly if the module is available:if importlib.util.find_spec("executorlib.interactive.flux"): from executorlib.interactive.flux import FluxPythonSpawnerTools
Ruff
11-11:
executorlib.interactive.flux.FluxPythonSpawnerimported but unused; consider usingimportlib.util.find_specto test for availability(F401)
tests/test_shared_communication.py (1)
17-17: Correct implementation ofMpiExecSpawnerin tests.The import of
MpiExecSpawnerand its usage intest_interface_mpiandtest_interface_serialare correctly implemented, aligning with the PR objectives. Verify that the functionality of these tests remains consistent with the previous implementation.The changes are approved.
Also applies to: 35-35, 63-63
Verification successful
Correct usage of
MpiExecSpawnerin test functions.The import and usage of
MpiExecSpawnerintests/test_shared_communication.pyare correctly implemented. The instances where it is used align with the intended changes and configurations. The changes are consistent with the PR objectives, and the functionality appears to be correctly tested.
- Import and usage of
MpiExecSpawnerconfirmed intests/test_shared_communication.py.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of `MpiExecSpawner` in the test functions. # Test: Run the test suite to ensure that the functionality remains consistent. # Note: This script assumes the presence of a test runner in the environment. python -m unittest discover -s testsLength of output: 112
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the usage of `MpiExecSpawner` in the test functions within the test file. ast-grep --lang python --pattern 'MpiExecSpawner($_)' tests/test_shared_communication.pyLength of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Use ripgrep to search for any occurrence of `MpiExecSpawner` in the test file. rg 'MpiExecSpawner' tests/test_shared_communication.pyLength of output: 262
tests/test_shared_backend.py (3)
94-94: Verify the functionality of the new spawner class.The replacement of
SrunInterfacewithSrunSpawneris consistent with the PR's objectives. Ensure that the new spawner class provides the same or enhanced functionality as the old interface class.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the functionality of the new spawner class:
Verification successful
The
SrunSpawnerclass is functioning correctly.The
SrunSpawnerclass is integrated into the codebase and is being tested intests/test_shared_backend.py. Its usage across multiple files indicates that it provides the necessary functionality, replacingSrunInterfaceappropriately.
SrunSpawneris defined inexecutorlib/shared/spawner.py.- It is used and tested in
tests/test_shared_backend.py.- It is integrated into
executorlib/interactive/__init__.py.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the new spawner class. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'SrunSpawner'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the new spawner class. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type py -A 5 $'SrunSpawner'Length of output: 3234
25-25: Verify the functionality of the new spawner class.The replacement of
MpiExecInterfacewithMpiExecSpawneris consistent with the PR's objectives. Ensure that the new spawner class provides the same or enhanced functionality as the old interface class.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the functionality of the new spawner class:
Verification successful
The
MpiExecSpawnerclass is well-integrated and tested.The
MpiExecSpawnerclass is used across multiple test files and modules, indicating that it is a functional replacement for theMpiExecInterface. The presence of tests covering various scenarios suggests that its functionality is thoroughly verified.
- Files with
MpiExecSpawnerusage:
tests/test_shared_communication.pytests/test_local_executor_future.pytests/test_shared_backend.pytests/test_local_executor.pyexecutorlib/shared/spawner.pyScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the new spawner class. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'MpiExecSpawner'Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the new spawner class. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type py -A 5 $'MpiExecSpawner'Length of output: 18862
54-54: Verify the functionality of the new spawner class.The replacement of
SrunInterfacewithSrunSpawneris consistent with the PR's objectives. Ensure that the new spawner class provides the same or enhanced functionality as the old interface class.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the functionality of the new spawner class:
Verification successful
SrunSpawner functionality verified successfully.
The
SrunSpawnerclass is integrated into the codebase and used in various contexts, replacing the oldSrunInterface. Its presence in test files and other modules suggests that it provides the intended functionality. No issues were found with its integration.
SrunSpawneris instantiated and tested intests/test_shared_backend.py.- It is used in
executorlib/interactive/__init__.pyandexecutorlib/shared/__init__.py.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the new spawner class. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'SrunSpawner'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the functionality of the new spawner class. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type py -A 5 $'SrunSpawner'Length of output: 3234
tests/test_local_executor_future.py (5)
9-9: Update import statement to reflect new class name.The import statement correctly reflects the transition from
MpiExecInterfacetoMpiExecSpawner.
24-24: Correct usage of new spawner class in test case.The test case
test_pool_serialcorrectly usesMpiExecSpawnerin theInteractiveExecutor. This change aligns with the PR objectives.
40-40: Proper integration of new spawner class with multi-core support.The test case
test_pool_serial_multi_corecorrectly integratesMpiExecSpawnerwith multi-core settings, ensuring that the new class functions as expected in a more complex scenario.
72-72: Appropriate use of new spawner class in garbage collection test.The test case
test_independence_from_executoreffectively demonstrates the independence of futures from the executor, using the newMpiExecSpawnercorrectly.
112-112: Correct implementation of new spawner class within class context.The subtest "From inside a class" in
test_independence_from_executorcorrectly usesMpiExecSpawner, demonstrating its functionality within a class-based test scenario.tests/test_flux_executor.py (9)
14-14: Update import statement to reflect new class name.The import statement correctly reflects the transition from
FluxPythonInterfacetoFluxPythonSpawner.
53-53: Correct usage of new spawner class in test case.The test case
test_flux_executor_serialcorrectly usesFluxPythonSpawnerin theInteractiveExecutor. This change aligns with the PR objectives.
66-66: Proper integration of new spawner class with thread support.The test case
test_flux_executor_threadscorrectly integratesFluxPythonSpawnerwith thread settings, ensuring that the new class functions as expected in a threaded scenario.
79-79: Appropriate use of new spawner class in parallel execution test.The test case
test_flux_executor_paralleleffectively demonstrates the parallel execution capabilities, using the newFluxPythonSpawnercorrectly.
89-89: Correct implementation of new spawner class in map-reduce style operation.The test case
test_single_taskcorrectly usesFluxPythonSpawner, demonstrating its functionality in a map-reduce style operation.
107-107: Appropriate use of new spawner class in task queue execution test.The test case
test_execute_taskeffectively demonstrates task management via a queue, using the newFluxPythonSpawnercorrectly.
123-123: Proper integration of new spawner class with thread settings in task queue execution test.The test case
test_execute_task_threadscorrectly integratesFluxPythonSpawnerwith thread settings, ensuring that the new class functions as expected in a threaded task queue scenario.
136-136: Appropriate use of new spawner class in internal memory state management test.The test case
test_internal_memoryeffectively demonstrates the management of internal state, using the newFluxPythonSpawnercorrectly.
145-153: Correct handling of exceptions with new spawner class.The test case
test_interface_exceptioneffectively demonstrates the exception handling capabilities of the newFluxPythonSpawnerin various configurations.executorlib/shared/communication.py (2)
13-13: Update type annotations to reflect new spawner class.The type annotations in the
SocketInterfaceclass have been correctly updated to useexecutorlib.shared.spawner.BaseSpawner, aligning with the PR objectives.Also applies to: 21-21
136-136: Correct update of type annotations in function signature.The
interface_bootupfunction has been correctly updated to useexecutorlib.shared.spawner.BaseSpawnerin its type annotations, ensuring consistency with the new spawner architecture.executorlib/interactive/__init__.py (2)
21-24: Import changes are correct and consistent with the PR objectives.The replacement of interface classes with spawner classes in the imports aligns with the refactoring goals.
Also applies to: 28-28
125-131: Functioncreate_executorcorrectly integrates new spawner classes.The function now uses
FluxPythonSpawner,SrunSpawner, andMpiExecSpawnerinstead of their interface counterparts. This change is consistent with the refactoring goals.Ensure that the new spawner classes are fully compatible and integrated correctly by running integration tests or checking other parts of the system where these classes are used.
Also applies to: 145-151, 167-173
executorlib/shared/spawner.py (3)
58-58: ClassSubprocessSpawnercorrectly renamed.The renaming from
SubprocessInterfacetoSubprocessSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.
146-146: ClassMpiExecSpawnercorrectly renamed.The renaming from
MpiExecInterfacetoMpiExecSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.
166-166: ClassSrunSpawnercorrectly renamed.The renaming from
SrunInterfacetoSrunSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.tests/test_local_executor.py (10)
67-67: Test functiontest_pympiexecutor_two_workerscorrectly usesMpiExecSpawner.The update to use
MpiExecSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.
81-81: Test functiontest_pympiexecutor_one_workercorrectly usesMpiExecSpawner.The update to use
MpiExecSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.
97-97: Test functiontest_pympiexecutor_two_workersinTestPyMpiExecutorStepSerialcorrectly usesMpiExecSpawner.The update to use
MpiExecSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.
111-111: Test functiontest_pympiexecutor_one_workerinTestPyMpiExecutorStepSerialcorrectly usesMpiExecSpawner.The update to use
MpiExecSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.
130-130: Test functiontest_pympiexecutor_one_worker_with_mpicorrectly usesMpiExecSpawner.The update to use
MpiExecSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.
141-141: Test functiontest_pympiexecutor_one_worker_with_mpi_multiple_submissionscorrectly usesMpiExecSpawner.The update to use
MpiExecSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.
161-161: Test functiontest_pympiexecutor_one_worker_with_mpi_echocorrectly usesMpiExecSpawner.The update to use
MpiExecSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.
176-176: Test functiontest_pympiexecutor_one_worker_with_mpiinTestPyMpiStepExecutorMPIcorrectly usesMpiExecSpawner.The update to use
MpiExecSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.
187-187: Test functiontest_pympiexecutor_one_worker_with_mpi_multiple_submissionsinTestPyMpiStepExecutorMPIcorrectly usesMpiExecSpawner.The update to use
MpiExecSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.
207-207: Test functiontest_pympiexecutor_one_worker_with_mpi_echoinTestPyMpiStepExecutorMPIcorrectly usesMpiExecSpawner.The update to use
MpiExecSpawneraligns with the refactoring goals.executorlib/shared/executor.py (4)
22-22: Update import statements to reflect new architecture.The import statement has been updated to reflect the transition from
BaseInterfaceandMpiExecInterfacetoBaseSpawnerandMpiExecSpawner. This change is consistent with the PR objectives and the summary provided.The changes are approved as they align with the new spawner architecture.
Line range hint
624-636: Approve the updated function signature and documentation.The function
_submit_function_to_separate_processnow correctly usesBaseSpawneras per the new architecture. The documentation has been updated accordingly, which is crucial for maintaining clarity and consistency.The changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function Usage Verified:
The function
_submit_function_to_separate_processis correctly used with the updated signature throughout the codebase. The parameters in the function call match the new definition, ensuring consistency and correctness.
- The function call in
executorlib/shared/executor.pyaligns with the updated signature.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `_submit_function_to_separate_process` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'_submit_function_to_separate_process'Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `_submit_function_to_separate_process` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage across all files. rg -A 5 '_submit_function_to_separate_process'Length of output: 881
Line range hint
304-317: Approve the updated function signature and documentation.The function
execute_parallel_tasksnow correctly usesBaseSpawneras per the new architecture. The documentation has been updated accordingly, which is crucial for maintaining clarity and consistency.The changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function usage verified and approved.
The function
execute_parallel_tasksis consistently used with the updated signature across the codebase, including in test files. This confirms that the changes have been properly integrated and are being validated. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `execute_parallel_tasks` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'execute_parallel_tasks'Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `execute_parallel_tasks` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg -A 5 'execute_parallel_tasks'Length of output: 4773
Line range hint
365-375: Approve the updated function signature and documentation.The function
execute_separate_tasksnow correctly usesBaseSpawneras per the new architecture. The documentation has been updated accordingly, which is crucial for maintaining clarity and consistency.The changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
Verification successful
Function Usage Verified:
execute_separate_tasksThe function
execute_separate_tasksis used inexecutorlib/interactive/executor.pyand aligns with the updated signature. The use ofkwargsindicates that the function is being called with the necessary parameters, consistent with the new architecture involvingBaseSpawner.
- File:
executorlib/interactive/executor.py- Usage: The function is called with
kwargs, supporting the updated signature.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `execute_separate_tasks` match the new signature. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type python -A 5 $'execute_separate_tasks'Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `execute_separate_tasks` match the new signature. # Corrected Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg -t py -A 5 'execute_separate_tasks'Length of output: 1038
executorlib/interactive/executor.py (2)
Line range hint
7-49: Approved: Transition to Spawner classes in InteractiveExecutor.The transition from
BaseInterfacetoBaseSpawnerin theInteractiveExecutorclass is well-implemented. The default value ofinterface_classhas been correctly updated toMpiExecSpawner, aligning with the new architecture.The code changes are approved.
Ensure that all dependent components and systems integrate smoothly with this change by running integration tests.
Line range hint
76-101: Approved: Transition to Spawner classes in InteractiveStepExecutor.The transition from
BaseInterfacetoBaseSpawnerin theInteractiveStepExecutorclass is correctly implemented. The default value ofinterface_classhas been updated toMpiExecSpawner, consistent with the new spawner architecture.The code changes are approved.
Ensure that all dependent components and systems integrate smoothly with this change by running integration tests.
executorlib/interactive/flux.py (1)
6-9: Approved with suggestions: Update class name in docstrings for FluxPythonSpawner.The renaming of
FluxPythonInterfacetoFluxPythonSpawnerand the extension fromBaseSpawnerare correctly implemented. However, the docstring still refers to the old class name, which could lead to confusion.The code changes are approved.
Update the docstring to consistently reflect the new class name
FluxPythonSpawner.Verify that the new spawner class integrates smoothly with the rest of the system by running integration tests.
Also applies to: 17-17
| @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ | |||
| SLURM_COMMAND = "srun" | |||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
| class BaseInterface(ABC): | |||
| class BaseSpawner(ABC): | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Class BaseSpawner correctly renamed but lacks abstract methods.
The renaming from BaseInterface to BaseSpawner aligns with the refactoring goals. However, it's flagged that this abstract base class lacks abstract methods, which might be an oversight.
Consider adding abstract methods to enforce implementation in derived classes or reevaluate if this class needs to be abstract.
Tools
Ruff
9-9:
BaseSpawneris an abstract base class, but it has no abstract methods(B024)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests