Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add mypy #51

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 30, 2024
Merged

Add mypy #51

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 30, 2024

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Nov 30, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a GitHub Actions workflow for automated type checking with MyPy, enhancing code quality assurance.
  • Public API Changes

    • Updated the __all__ declaration in the conda_subprocess module to use string representations for exported entities.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced type safety by updating the parameter type in the _validate_prefix_name method for better clarity and maintainability.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduced in this pull request include the addition of a new GitHub Actions workflow for automated type checking using MyPy, which is triggered on pushes and pull requests to the main branch. Additionally, the __all__ declaration in the conda_subprocess/__init__.py file has been updated to export public entities as strings. Furthermore, the ctx parameter type in the _validate_prefix_name function of conda_subprocess/process.py has been changed from context to Context, enhancing type clarity.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/mypy.yml New workflow added for MyPy type checking on pushes and pull requests to the main branch.
conda_subprocess/init.py Updated __all__ from direct references to string representations of exported entities.
conda_subprocess/process.py Changed type of ctx parameter in _validate_prefix_name from context to Context.

Poem

In the burrow where code does play,
MyPy checks for bugs each day.
With strings in __all__, clear and bright,
Type safety hops into the light!
A change in context, oh what a sight! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/mypy.yml (2)

11-16: Add pip dependency caching

Adding pip caching will speed up the workflow execution.

     runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    strategy:
+      matrix:
+        python-version: ["3.12"]
     steps:
       - name: Setup Python
         uses: actions/setup-python@v5
         with:
-          python-version: "3.13"
+          python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }}
           architecture: x64
+      - name: Cache pip packages
+        uses: actions/cache@v3
+        with:
+          path: ~/.cache/pip
+          key: ${{ runner.os }}-pip-${{ hashFiles('**/setup.py') }}
+          restore-keys: |
+            ${{ runner.os }}-pip-

21-22: Add newline at end of file and consider additional mypy flags

  1. Add a newline at the end of file
  2. Consider adding stricter mypy flags for better type checking
      - name: Test
-       run: mypy --ignore-missing-imports ${{ github.event.repository.name }}
+       run: mypy --ignore-missing-imports --strict ${{ github.event.repository.name }}
+
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 22-22: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

conda_subprocess/process.py (2)

131-131: LGTM! Consider adding type annotation for allow_base parameter.

The change from context to Context improves type precision. For completeness, consider adding a type annotation for the allow_base parameter.

-def _validate_prefix_name(prefix_name: str, ctx: Context, allow_base=True) -> str:
+def _validate_prefix_name(prefix_name: str, ctx: Context, allow_base: bool = True) -> str:

Line range hint 1-165: Consider adding type annotations to other functions.

Since you're adding mypy support, consider adding type annotations to other functions in the file for better type safety and documentation. Key functions that would benefit:

  • Popen
  • _check_prefix
  • _check_args
  • _locate_prefix_by_name

Example for _check_args:

def _check_args(args: Union[str, List[str]]) -> List[str]:
    if isinstance(args, str):
        return args.split()
    else:
        return args
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 372437f and 78d6563.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/mypy.yml (1 hunks)
  • conda_subprocess/__init__.py (1 hunks)
  • conda_subprocess/process.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/mypy.yml

[error] 22-22: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
conda_subprocess/__init__.py (1)

8-12: LGTM! Good practice using string literals in __all__

The change to use string literals in __all__ instead of direct references is a good practice that:

  • Follows Python's documentation recommendations
  • Prevents potential circular import issues
  • Makes the exported names more explicit
  • Aligns well with static type checking (mypy)

Let's verify that the exports work as expected:

✅ Verification successful

Exports in __all__ are properly structured and sourced

Based on the verification results:

  • All exported names (Popen, call, check_call, check_output, run) are properly imported from their respective modules:
    • Popen from conda_subprocess.process
    • call, check_call, check_output, run from conda_subprocess.interface
  • The source files containing the implementations exist:
    • interface.py and process.py contain the function definitions
    • The imports form a valid dependency chain without circular references

The string literals in __all__ correctly match the imported names, making this a proper implementation that aligns with Python best practices and static type checking requirements.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all exported names are properly importable
# Expected: The exports should be accessible when importing from conda_subprocess

# Check if the module can be imported and the exports are accessible
python3 -c "
from conda_subprocess import Popen, call, check_call, check_output, run
print('All exports are accessible')
" 2>&1 || echo "Error: Some exports are not accessible"

# Verify no other names are accidentally exported
python3 -c "
import conda_subprocess
print('Exported names:', sorted(name for name in dir(conda_subprocess) if not name.startswith('_')))
" 2>&1

Length of output: 568


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify the exports by checking the source code structure
# First, check the __init__.py content
cat conda_subprocess/__init__.py

# Then check if the exported names are defined in the module
rg -l "def (Popen|call|check_call|check_output|run)\(" conda_subprocess/

# Also check for any import statements of these names
rg "^from .+ import .*(Popen|call|check_call|check_output|run)" conda_subprocess/

Length of output: 1003


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementations to verify these are properly defined
# Check interface.py implementations
ast-grep --pattern 'def $name($$$) { $$$ }' conda_subprocess/interface.py

# Check process.py implementation of Popen
ast-grep --pattern 'class Popen($$$) { $$$ }' conda_subprocess/process.py

Length of output: 151

conda_subprocess/process.py (1)

9-9: LGTM! Import addition aligns with mypy integration.

The explicit import of Context improves type clarity and supports static type checking.

Comment on lines +19 to +20
- name: Install mypy
run: pip install mypy
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add package installation step

MyPy needs to analyze the installed package. The current workflow only installs mypy but not the package itself.

      - name: Install mypy
-       run: pip install mypy
+       run: |
+         pip install mypy
+         pip install -e .
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- name: Install mypy
run: pip install mypy
- name: Install mypy
run: |
pip install mypy
pip install -e .

Comment on lines +15 to +16
python-version: "3.13"
architecture: x64
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Consider using a stable Python version

Python 3.13 is currently in alpha and might lead to unstable CI results. Consider using Python 3.11 or 3.12 instead.

- python-version: "3.13"
+ python-version: "3.12"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
python-version: "3.13"
architecture: x64
python-version: "3.12"
architecture: x64

Comment on lines +1 to +22
name: MyPy

on:
push:
branches: [ main ]
pull_request:

jobs:
mypy:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Setup Python
uses: actions/setup-python@v5
with:
python-version: "3.13"
architecture: x64
- name: Checkout
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Install mypy
run: pip install mypy
- name: Test
run: mypy --ignore-missing-imports ${{ github.event.repository.name }}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Add mypy configuration for consistent type checking

The repository lacks mypy configuration settings. Since the project uses pyproject.toml for other configurations, I recommend adding a [tool.mypy] section to maintain consistent type checking behavior. This is particularly important as the CI workflow runs mypy checks.

Key points to consider:

  • No mypy configuration found in pyproject.toml
  • No separate mypy.ini or setup.cfg files exist
  • Current CI runs with --ignore-missing-imports flag only
🔗 Analysis chain

Verify mypy configuration file existence

It would be beneficial to check if a mypy configuration file exists in the repository to ensure consistent type checking settings.


Let me check the content of pyproject.toml to see if it has any mypy configuration, even if not under the [tool.mypy] section.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for mypy config files
echo "Checking for mypy configuration files..."
fd -t f "mypy.ini|setup.cfg|pyproject.toml"

# If pyproject.toml exists, check for mypy section
if [ -f "pyproject.toml" ]; then
    echo "Checking pyproject.toml for mypy configuration..."
    cat pyproject.toml | grep -A 10 "\[tool.mypy\]"
fi

Length of output: 338


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Display the full content of pyproject.toml
echo "Content of pyproject.toml:"
cat pyproject.toml

Length of output: 1414

🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)

[error] 22-22: no new line character at the end of file

(new-line-at-end-of-file)

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit e2c70c6 into main Nov 30, 2024
17 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the mypy branch November 30, 2024 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant