Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement Executor interface #333

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 31, 2024
Merged

Implement Executor interface #333

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 31, 2024

Conversation

jan-janssen
Copy link
Member

@jan-janssen jan-janssen commented Aug 31, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced functionality for managing tasks in parallel execution, enhancing performance and flexibility in task handling.
    • Added unit tests for validating LAMMPS-based energy volume curve calculations, ensuring accuracy in parallel processing scenarios.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of task conversions between dictionary and list formats to ensure consistency during execution.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 31, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new module for parallel task execution in Python, utilizing the concurrent.futures library. It includes functions for converting task formats and executing tasks in parallel. Additionally, a unit test class is added to validate the functionality of energy volume curve calculations using LAMMPS, ensuring correct evaluations and assertions on thermal properties.

Changes

Files Change Summary
atomistics/shared/parallel.py Introduced functions for managing parallel task execution: converting task formats and evaluating tasks.
tests/test_evcurve_lammps_function_parallel.py Added unit tests for LAMMPS-based energy volume curve calculations, validating thermal properties.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant ParallelExecutor
    participant TaskManager
    participant LAMMPS

    User->>TaskManager: Define tasks
    TaskManager->>ParallelExecutor: Convert tasks to list
    ParallelExecutor->>LAMMPS: Execute tasks in parallel
    LAMMPS-->>ParallelExecutor: Return results
    ParallelExecutor->>TaskManager: Convert results to dictionary
    TaskManager-->>User: Return final results
Loading

Poem

🐇
In the meadow where bunnies play,
New tasks hop in, brightening the day.
With parallel leaps, they swiftly align,
Energy curves dance, oh how they shine!
LAMMPS sings sweet, in harmony's tune,
A joyful leap under the bright, silver moon.
🌙


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0db718 and a6f2984.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • atomistics/shared/parallel.py (1 hunks)
  • tests/test_evcurve_lammps_function_parallel.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
atomistics/shared/parallel.py

20-20: Use key not in dict instead of key not in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)

Additional comments not posted (3)
atomistics/shared/parallel.py (2)

4-12: LGTM!

The function _convert_task_dict_to_task_lst is well-implemented and handles both nested and non-nested task data effectively.


33-42: Well-implemented parallel execution function.

The function evaluate_with_parallel_executor effectively utilizes the concurrent.futures library for parallel task execution. The use of helper functions for converting task formats before and after execution is a good practice.

tests/test_evcurve_lammps_function_parallel.py (1)

27-79: Comprehensive and well-structured test method.

The test method test_calc_evcurve_functional is well-structured and covers the setup, execution, and validation of results effectively. It makes good use of the evaluate_with_parallel_executor function for parallel execution. Consider adding more detailed assertions to ensure the robustness of the test, especially for edge cases and error handling.

Comment on lines 15 to 30
def _convert_task_lst_to_task_dict(task_lst: list) -> dict:
task_dict = {}
for task in task_lst:
for task_name, task_data in task.items():
if isinstance(task_data, dict):
if task_name not in task_dict.keys():
task_dict[task_name] = {}
task_dict[task_name].update(
{
task_parameter: task_object
for task_parameter, task_object in task_data.items()
}
)
else:
task_dict[task_name] = task_data
return task_dict
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Optimize dictionary key check.

The function _convert_task_lst_to_task_dict is correctly implemented. However, you can optimize the dictionary key check by removing .keys() as suggested by the static analysis tool. This change will make the code cleaner and slightly more efficient.

Apply this diff to optimize the dictionary key check:

- if task_name not in task_dict.keys():
+ if task_name not in task_dict:
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
def _convert_task_lst_to_task_dict(task_lst: list) -> dict:
task_dict = {}
for task in task_lst:
for task_name, task_data in task.items():
if isinstance(task_data, dict):
if task_name not in task_dict.keys():
task_dict[task_name] = {}
task_dict[task_name].update(
{
task_parameter: task_object
for task_parameter, task_object in task_data.items()
}
)
else:
task_dict[task_name] = task_data
return task_dict
def _convert_task_lst_to_task_dict(task_lst: list) -> dict:
task_dict = {}
for task in task_lst:
for task_name, task_data in task.items():
if isinstance(task_data, dict):
if task_name not in task_dict:
task_dict[task_name] = {}
task_dict[task_name].update(
{
task_parameter: task_object
for task_parameter, task_object in task_data.items()
}
)
else:
task_dict[task_name] = task_data
return task_dict
Tools
Ruff

20-20: Use key not in dict instead of key not in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6f2984 and 9e16491.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • atomistics/shared/parallel.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
atomistics/shared/parallel.py

40-40: Use key not in dict instead of key not in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)

Additional comments not posted (3)
atomistics/shared/parallel.py (3)

4-22: Well-documented and correctly implemented.

The function _convert_task_dict_to_task_lst is well-documented and the implementation correctly converts a dictionary of tasks into a list format. This is crucial for the flexibility of task handling in parallel execution contexts.


25-50: Optimize dictionary key check.

The function _convert_task_lst_to_task_dict is correctly implemented. However, you can optimize the dictionary key check by removing .keys() as suggested by the static analysis tool. This change will make the code cleaner and slightly more efficient.

Apply this diff to optimize the dictionary key check:

- if task_name not in task_dict.keys():
+ if task_name not in task_dict:
Tools
Ruff

40-40: Use key not in dict instead of key not in dict.keys()

Remove .keys()

(SIM118)


53-75: Effective use of the Executor interface.

The function evaluate_with_parallel_executor effectively uses the Executor interface to execute tasks in parallel. It integrates the task conversion functions _convert_task_dict_to_task_lst and _convert_task_lst_to_task_dict to handle task formats efficiently. This implementation should provide robust parallel execution capabilities.

@jan-janssen jan-janssen merged commit fa7bb32 into main Aug 31, 2024
22 checks passed
@jan-janssen jan-janssen deleted the parallel branch August 31, 2024 08:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant