Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pull Request Labeler - Workaround sync-labels bug #7431

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 10, 2023

Conversation

Illviljan
Copy link
Contributor

@Illviljan Illviljan commented Jan 10, 2023

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Automation Github bots, testing workflows, release automation label Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan added run-benchmark Run the ASV benchmark workflow and removed Automation Github bots, testing workflows, release automation labels Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan closed this Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan reopened this Jan 10, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added Automation Github bots, testing workflows, release automation and removed run-benchmark Run the ASV benchmark workflow labels Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan added the run-benchmark Run the ASV benchmark workflow label Jan 10, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the run-benchmark Run the ASV benchmark workflow label Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan added run-benchmark Run the ASV benchmark workflow run-benchmark-bot labels Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan closed this Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan reopened this Jan 10, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the run-benchmark Run the ASV benchmark workflow label Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan closed this Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan reopened this Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan added topic-performance run-benchmark Run the ASV benchmark workflow and removed run-benchmark-bot labels Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan closed this Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan Illviljan reopened this Jan 10, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot removed run-benchmark Run the ASV benchmark workflow topic-performance labels Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Illviljan commented Jan 10, 2023

Seems bot uses labeler from main? I'll merge and see what want happens..

@Illviljan Illviljan merged commit f3b7c69 into pydata:main Jan 10, 2023
@Illviljan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Seems to work, tested a little here #7426.

dcherian added a commit to dcherian/xarray that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2023
* main: (41 commits)
  v2023.01.0 whats-new (pydata#7440)
  explain keep_attrs in docstring of apply_ufunc (pydata#7445)
  Add sentence to open_dataset docstring (pydata#7438)
  pin scipy version in doc environment (pydata#7436)
  Improve performance for backend datetime handling (pydata#7374)
  fix typo (pydata#7433)
  Add lazy backend ASV test (pydata#7426)
  Pull Request Labeler - Workaround sync-labels bug (pydata#7431)
  see also : groupby in resample doc and vice-versa (pydata#7425)
  Some alignment optimizations (pydata#7382)
  Make `broadcast` and `concat` work with the Array API (pydata#7387)
  remove `numbagg` and `numba` from the upstream-dev CI (pydata#7416)
  [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (pydata#7402)
  Preserve original dtype when accessing MultiIndex levels (pydata#7393)
  [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (pydata#7389)
  [pre-commit.ci] pre-commit autoupdate (pydata#7360)
  COMPAT: Adjust CFTimeIndex.get_loc for pandas 2.0 deprecation enforcement (pydata#7361)
  Avoid loading entire dataset by getting the nbytes in an array (pydata#7356)
  `keep_attrs` for pad (pydata#7267)
  Bump pypa/gh-action-pypi-publish from 1.5.1 to 1.6.4 (pydata#7375)
  ...
TomNicholas added a commit to TomNicholas/xarray that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2023
TomNicholas added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2023
* remove labeler bot config

* remove labeler workflows

* revert #7431
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Automation Github bots, testing workflows, release automation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant