-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding vectorized indexing docs #4711
Merged
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
40f0050
Add example to sel docstring #4630
EricKeenan 942dc17
Add vectorized indexing example to narrative docs (#4630)
EricKeenan 33c6216
Update example to use a dataarray that is made with np.arange
EricKeenan 5b94de5
Add dataarray.isel example
EricKeenan 404f1f1
Attempting to fix a formatting error
EricKeenan 33ee0f9
Add prompts to example
EricKeenan 7949744
Fix: Forgot to add prompts to sel example.
EricKeenan b374a17
Apply suggestions from code review
mathause 0f83b76
Merge branch 'master' into vectorized-indexing-docs
mathause 1ad0c04
simplify example
mathause File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I did tell you to modify the vectorized indexing section, but while reading #3768 I noticed that we already document that in the
More advanced indexing
section. Given that it uses pointwise indexing as its only example, maybe we should rename it toPointwise indexing
to make this easier to find?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems like that section should be merged with "Vectorized Indexing" which could then be renamed to "Pointwise (or vectorized) Indexing)"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
agreed. Also, the term
vectorized indexing
is not really explained (unless I'm missing something, there's only a comment hinting at it's meaning), so it might be good to explicitly do that somewhere. This sounds like a lot of work, though, so it might be better to do that in a different PR.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interesting discussion. At this point, I don't think I have much to add here. So I concur that this should be addressed in a different PR.