Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove egd #3771

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 9, 2017
Merged

remove egd #3771

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 9, 2017

Conversation

reaperhulk
Copy link
Member

EGD is bad and old and we removed it from pyOpenSSL in 16.0.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@reaperhulk, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @alex, @Ayrx and @palaviv to be potential reviewers.

@@ -75,14 +75,6 @@ def cryptography_has_rsa_r_pkcs_decoding_error():
]


def cryptography_has_egd():
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove from the dict below as well

@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
"""

TYPES = """
static const long Cryptography_HAS_EGD;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we leave this constant but set to 0? Then there's no plausible backwards compat concern :-)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, why not. At some point it'd be good to remove it entirely but the two lines aren't going to be a maintenance burden in any way...

This shouldn't really be necessary but maybe we can fully remove it in
2018 or 2019...
@alex
Copy link
Member

alex commented Jul 9, 2017

Landing despite the coverage because it appears to be a bug.

@alex alex merged commit ae487bb into pyca:master Jul 9, 2017
@reaperhulk reaperhulk deleted the remove-egd branch September 21, 2017 10:16
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 13, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants