-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add support to archive repositories #226
Conversation
Not sure why both jobs are failing. 🤔 |
@dirien it's because you want to merge a branch from a fork. The repo is still not configured in a way that secrets are passed to workflow runs that started from a fork. This is an outstanding issue that @ringods and I worked upon but never came to a satisfiable solution. |
@tmeckel: I have no permission to create a branch in this repo. |
@dirien no need to close the PR. I'll review and merge when I've time. Sorry if my initial answer was misunderstandable in that way. |
@tmeckel sounds good! Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dirien I would set hasIssues
to false
, if a repository is archived hasIssues: args.archived === true ? false : true
. Because it makes no sense to enable issues on an archived repository.
Same with vulnerabilityAlerts
: vulnerabilityAlerts: args.archived === true ? false : true,
@tmeckel done |
This PR add support to archive a provider.
👀 @ringods @tmeckel