-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Solid Layers count for Top is wrong, esp. when Ensure Vertical Shell is selected #676
Comments
I just now tried this on Version 1.38.6, and got the same result. |
Do I need to scale your object? Would you please scale your object for me, so I can reproduce your issue? Would you please add screenshots and possibly the G-code? Thanks. |
Hi, Thanks for looking at this issue. Starting with the input file (either Base_input-issue-676-scale2540-rot90x .obj or .stl Next, slice, (I am running Version 1.38.6-prusa3d-win64) I am using the configuration in the file Observe the layers from 8.4mm to 9.4mm These are the top 6 layers of a portion of the base. I've attached the generated gcode (Base_final-issue-676.gcode) and also observed an interesting fact: If I export the STL file after scaling and rotating it, (Base_works-after-export.stl) then try loading and slicing this STL which Slic3r has exported, then I do not see the problem. So, somehow there is something funky in the original STL file but the STL file created by Slic3r avoids the problem. Thanks, and let me know if you need further information. |
sorry, hit close by accident. |
It is an effect of numerical instability of the underlying clipper library, when working with polygons with holes. I have patched some of the issues in #60 and #79, but not all of them. After I patched #60 and #79, I knew of only a single occurrence of this issue, and only on Linux. Now I have another example :-) The issue could be worked around for this particular model by setting a resolution field at the Print Settings->Advanced->Resolution to 0.1mm. But I don't consider this advice to be a fix. |
Would you please retest with the Slic3r 1.40.0-alpha1? It seems this issue is no more reproducible with the alpha. https://github.com/prusa3d/Slic3r/releases/tag/untagged-8fc8ca127d0924fe5504 |
Your download link gave me a 404, for some reason, but I got the
1.40.0-alpha1 build from github:
(
3bc8d75
)
https://github.com/prusa3d/Slic3r/releases/download/version_1.40.0-alpha1/Slic3rPE-1.40.0-alpha1.win64-full-201805141300.zip
It worked great with my model; the previous error is gone.
I really like what you've done with the presets and the configuration
pages. Very nice, keep up the great work!
I think you can close my issue, with this new release.
Thanks and Best Regards-
Alan
…On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 7:33 AM, bubnikv ***@***.***> wrote:
Would you please retest with the Slic3r 1.40.0-alpha1? It seems this issue
is no more reproducible with the alpha.
https://github.com/prusa3d/Slic3r/releases/tag/untagged-
8fc8ca127d0924fe5504
—
You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#676 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AhkuO0-PgxAZ7CfdBNY4jZxNG_HunSNXks5tzA6WgaJpZM4RV2mj>
.
--
Alan Sieving, [email protected]
Quickware Engineering & Design, LLC.
32 Pleasant Street, Waltham, MA 02452-6133 USA
W: 617-947-1821 Fax: 866-565-8559
|
Thanks Alan for heads up. Our team appreciates the warm words. I am not quite sure whether we really fixed this issue, or whether it has been just masked. We did some changes in the model import, which may or may not have fixed this issue. Anyway, as we cannot reproduce it with the current code base, let's close this issue. If you encounter a similar issue, please reopen this issue. Thanks. |
Version
Version 1.37.2-prusa3d-win64
Operating system type + version
Windows 7 Pro-64 bit SP1
Behavior
Slicer does not generate the requested number of top solid layers.
In the supplied OBJ file, I selected 6 bottom layers, 6 top layers, and had "ensure vertical shell thickness" selected.
The resulting file had 6 bottom layers and only 2 top layers.
It looks like this has had similar issues in the past (#60 and #79), but they have been marked as fixed?
I tried adjusting the bottom layer count, and that sometimes resulted in more top layers. Also, I turned off Ensure vertical shell thickness, and that seemed to improve the top layer count. I am attaching the OBJ file and the config file. Slice it and observe the layers at 8.40mm .. 9.40mm
I believe, because of the chamber on the top edge, the top layers aren't all the same size, and so the vertical shell code is getting enforced, to the exclusion of the top layer count. I think the correct behavior should be that top layer count would force the solid fill first, and then the vertical shell code would add in area, if it were still needed.
In this particular example, there is a solid layer at 8.40, then more infill layers, and then two layers of solid. It should be solid from 8.40..9.40.
Let me know if you need more clarification.
STL/Config (.ZIP) where problem occurs
qed-2018-0107-top-layers.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: