Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate counts for floor and roof support interface layers #4288

Closed
fpikus opened this issue May 22, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Separate counts for floor and roof support interface layers #4288

fpikus opened this issue May 22, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@fpikus
Copy link

fpikus commented May 22, 2020

Version

Version of PrusaSlicer used goes here
2.2.0

Operating system type + version

Windows 10 Pro

3D printer brand / version + firmware version (if known)

Prusa MK2.5

Behavior

Dense interface layers are often required to support parts that rest on supports and don't have much area on the initial layer (like elbows pointing down). But then I get the same number of interface layers on the bottom of the supports, between the model and the supports, and those are much harder to remove. There should be a way to not have any interface layers below supports, at least, if not a separate count. Also, a larger gap option would be nice. I care about how good the first layer of the model above the support is. The first layer of supports above the model can be rough, as long as it sticks and the supports build up on it, I don't care what it looks like.

Is this a new feature request?
Yes.

@rtyr
Copy link
Collaborator

rtyr commented May 31, 2020

Similar to #3772.

@rtyr rtyr added the supports label May 31, 2020
bubnikv added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 19, 2021
interface layer was errorneously created.

Follow-up to 00db3dc
73b88e6
referencing the issues fixed by the above commits:
Fixes Allow to disable raft under support structures. #3772
Fixes Separate counts for floor and roof support interface layers #4288
@bubnikv
Copy link
Collaborator

bubnikv commented Mar 19, 2021

fixed with 6f3f362

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants