You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
3D printer brand / version + firmware version (if known)
Prusa MK2.5
Behavior
Dense interface layers are often required to support parts that rest on supports and don't have much area on the initial layer (like elbows pointing down). But then I get the same number of interface layers on the bottom of the supports, between the model and the supports, and those are much harder to remove. There should be a way to not have any interface layers below supports, at least, if not a separate count. Also, a larger gap option would be nice. I care about how good the first layer of the model above the support is. The first layer of supports above the model can be rough, as long as it sticks and the supports build up on it, I don't care what it looks like.
Is this a new feature request?
Yes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
interface layer was errorneously created.
Follow-up to 00db3dc73b88e6
referencing the issues fixed by the above commits:
Fixes Allow to disable raft under support structures. #3772
Fixes Separate counts for floor and roof support interface layers #4288
Version
Version of PrusaSlicer used goes here
2.2.0
Operating system type + version
Windows 10 Pro
3D printer brand / version + firmware version (if known)
Prusa MK2.5
Behavior
Dense interface layers are often required to support parts that rest on supports and don't have much area on the initial layer (like elbows pointing down). But then I get the same number of interface layers on the bottom of the supports, between the model and the supports, and those are much harder to remove. There should be a way to not have any interface layers below supports, at least, if not a separate count. Also, a larger gap option would be nice. I care about how good the first layer of the model above the support is. The first layer of supports above the model can be rough, as long as it sticks and the supports build up on it, I don't care what it looks like.
Is this a new feature request?
Yes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: