Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Infill does not align with lower layers #13

Closed
CReimer opened this issue Nov 3, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Infill does not align with lower layers #13

CReimer opened this issue Nov 3, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@CReimer
Copy link

CReimer commented Nov 3, 2016

Version

Git rev f278fa4

Operating system type + version

Arch Linux

Behavior

In the last stable version all infill patterns aligned with the layer below. This is no longer the case. See screenshot
bildschirmfoto von 2016-11-03 20-40-19

Is this a new feature request?

STL/Config (.ZIP) where problem occurs

https://www.thingiverse.com/download:90409
scaled to 1000%

@bubnikv
Copy link
Collaborator

bubnikv commented Nov 3, 2016

Thanks, I see it. That bug has been introduced while re-writing the rest of the infills from Perl to C++. I hope this applies to the bridges problem as well. The infill is aligned in the official 1.31.2 build correctly.

bubnikv added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 4, 2016
The BoundingBox::defined flag was not set in constructor,
if initialized from min/max corners.
@bubnikv
Copy link
Collaborator

bubnikv commented Nov 4, 2016

Fixed, there was a bug in an initialization of a bounding box, it's "valid" flag has been left uninitialized, therefore the chaotic behavior.

@bubnikv bubnikv closed this as completed Nov 4, 2016
alranel pushed a commit to slic3r/Slic3r that referenced this issue Nov 24, 2016
The BoundingBox::defined flag was not set in constructor,
if initialized from min/max corners.

Conflicts:

	xs/src/libslic3r/BoundingBox.hpp
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants