Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JavaScript: segregate references to binary functionality #1802

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 19, 2016

Conversation

haberman
Copy link
Member

This change will help us separate binary support into
separate files, because we only refer to binary serialization
functions in the actual binary serialization paths.

This change will help us separate binary support into
separate files, because we only refer to binary serialization
functions in the actual binary serialization paths.
@haberman
Copy link
Member Author

Review to @joeltine.

@haberman haberman changed the title JavaScript maps: move binary callbacks out of constructor. JavaScript: segregate references to binary functionality Jul 18, 2016
@@ -9,12 +9,14 @@ goog.require('goog.object');
goog.require('jspb.BinaryReader');
goog.require('jspb.BinaryWriter');
goog.require('jspb.ExtensionFieldInfo');
goog.require('jspb.ExtensionFieldBinaryInfo');

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

goog.require ordering

@joeltine
Copy link

LGTM.

@haberman haberman merged commit 77b08af into protocolbuffers:master Jul 19, 2016
@haberman haberman deleted the jsmapbin branch January 2, 2019 23:20
adellahlou pushed a commit to adellahlou/protobuf that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2023
* fix: add import long to the generated .d.ts

* fix: do not add import long to the main index.d.ts
bithium pushed a commit to bithium/protobuf that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2023
JavaScript: segregate references to binary functionality
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants