You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Through a support ticket, it came to our attention that recurring payments are not always started with the mandate ID from the subscription. Instead, recurring payments are started with the latest created mandate.
Als wij kijken bij Pronamic Pay dan zien wij dat de abonnementen zodanig zijn ingesteld dat ze zijn gekoppeld aan de juiste ingezonden formulieren in GF, dus in Pronamic Pay lijkt het alsof de abonnementen aan de juiste klanten zijn gekoppeld, maar.....
Mollie krijgt de gegevens op de één of andere manier verkeerd binnen. Hierdoor hebben ze nu alle bovengenoemde donaties van de rekening van ** ***** afgehaald. (zie fotobijlage).
I researched the issue and it appears that an empty BankAccountDetails object causes the issue (instead of null value for $payment->get_bank_account_details()):
Through a support ticket, it came to our attention that recurring payments are not always started with the mandate ID from the subscription. Instead, recurring payments are started with the latest created mandate.
I researched the issue and it appears that an empty
BankAccountDetails
object causes the issue (instead ofnull
value for$payment->get_bank_account_details()
):wp-pronamic-pay-mollie/src/Gateway.php
Lines 597 to 626 in c0b2e8a
The empty consumer bank details object is created in https://github.com/pronamic/wp-pay-core/blob/f220aa2ee979389cfcae782ff643b681ff85013b/src/Plugin.php#L1034-L1053
Internal Help Scout ticket: https://secure.helpscout.net/conversation/2033376897/24587
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: