Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document the issues of InstrumentHandler #201

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2016
Merged

Document the issues of InstrumentHandler #201

merged 1 commit into from
May 17, 2016

Conversation

beorn7
Copy link
Member

@beorn7 beorn7 commented May 15, 2016

Obvious next step: Fix those issues. (Which I'm already working on.)

@raliste This at least documents what you have run into in #200 .

Obvious next step: Fix those issues.
@raliste
Copy link

raliste commented May 15, 2016

Thank you @beorn7

I'll use direct instrumentation with request timing in the mean time.

@beorn7
Copy link
Member Author

beorn7 commented May 17, 2016

We need to fix the CI tests... unrelated to this (doc-comment only) change, though. Merging...

@beorn7 beorn7 merged commit d38f1ef into master May 17, 2016
@beorn7 beorn7 deleted the beorn7/doc branch May 17, 2016 09:07
@F21
Copy link

F21 commented Jun 22, 2016

@beorn7 Sorry for going a bit off topic, but is there any progress on fixing the InstrumentHandler? I am happy to help if needed 😄

@beorn7
Copy link
Member Author

beorn7 commented Jun 23, 2016

I recommend explicit instrumentation for now. There is no easy "fix" for the issues of InstrumentHandler. The problem has to be approached from a very different angle, which I'm working on. Explaining the context for that would take longer than implementing it myself.

@F21
Copy link

F21 commented Jun 23, 2016

Cool 😄 Looking forward to seeing your implementation. If you need any help, let me know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants