Implement deletion based on partially matching labels #1013
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
stone-z
force-pushed
the
delete-partial-match
branch
from
0eba7e4 to
9a8cb32
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nice! It looks quite good to me however, I personally did not have a code that needs functionality like this. This is why it would be amazing to have opinions from potential users: @taiyang-li @pstibrany
I added a small comment though, I think the DeletePartialMatchLabelValues(values..) semantics is too open. I wonder if DeletePartialMatchLabelValues(name, values ...) make more sense (:
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
stone-z
force-pushed
the
delete-partial-match
branch
from
0aae467 to
e79ef55
Compare
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
This is the exact function I needed . |
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
|
Ok, I've updated this PR with what I think @beorn7 had in mind. I am open to returning an error if a user passes a curried label to |
|
I'm aware, and this is on my review queue, but the queue is very long and progressing slowly. I'll get to this eventually, but feel free to make the call without me. |
|
I think it's safe to merge as the API got smaller and very sensible, but waiting for your eyes @beorn7 if you want to check it still. I am happy with this (: |
Signed-off-by: Zach Stone <[email protected]>
| func (m *MetricVec) DeletePartialMatch(labels Labels) int { | ||
| return m.metricMap.deleteByLabels(labels, m.curry) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is the computational complexity of this function? I imagine it is O(metrics count), right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct. I hoped to find a constant time implementation but didn't find one (at least at the time)
Towards #834. This is an approach which I think feels user-friendly and accomplishes what folks were asking for. Open to suggestions of course, I'm new here.
This PR introduces a new deletion method:
DeletePartialMatch(labels Labels)- deletes a metric if all of the given labels and associated values are present in that metric.It returns the number of metrics which were deleted.