-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for U.S. radiosondes #147
Comments
Depends on the radiosonde! From what I understand, in the US many sites are currently using the 1680 MHz radiosonde band. Usage of this band poses challenges for an automatic RX station, including:
There is a transition activity to move away from the 1680 MHz band, back to the worldwide 400-406 MHz band - this will make things a lot easier. I am aware of 3 different radiosonde types currently in use in the US, these are:
What I really need is more information on what is flying, so I can focus efforts appropriately. |
Thanks so much for the detailed response. Is the problem that the 1680 Mhz band is more attenuated by the atmosphere, and thus omnidirectional antennas, or receivers not corrected for frequency drift, can't pick it out of the noise floor? Also, when you say "No support" for the LMS6, does that mean you can pick up the signal but there isn't yet support for decoding its packet format? I live in Seattle, WA, and have on my todo list to go out to Quillayute, WA, where they launch sondes twice a day, and watch a launch. If it would help, I could ask them what they're flying and any other details that might be pertinent. |
The issue with the 1680 MHz band is mainly one of path loss, yes. A lot of the 1680 MHz sonde chasers I've seen are using higher gain antennas like helicals or dishes. While auto_rx does support driving a rotator (to track the sonde), this does increase complexity a lot. The drift issues are kind of a separate problem, which is possible to solve, but I just haven't gotten to it yet! There is a LMS6 decoder available, but I really need to get hold of one to be sure the scanning & detection aspects of auto_rx are going to work properly. I guess I could add it in and hope it works... Yes, more information on what they are launching, what frequency they use, and what their future plans with regards to sonde models and frequencies would be useful. |
FWIW, the National Weather Service web site has the text I've pasted below. The RS92-NGP looks from the Vaisala web site like a 400 Mhz device so maybe we're in luck?
The station in Quillayute flew the Mark IIA in 2011 so maybe they've upgraded to the NGP. |
The RS92-NGP is the 1680 MHz version of the RS92. I'm guessing the LMS6's they are using are also the 1680 MHz versions, so the same issues. I'll try and get my changes to help with frequency drift released soon (at least in the testing branch). It would be worth having a look on the 1680 MHz band to see if you can see anything - you will likely need to get a suitable antenna and a SAW/Preamp like this one: https://www.nooelec.com/store/sawbird-goes.html |
Thanks for the advice - no rush on getting stuff into testing, I'm probably at least a month or two from being able to do the experiment. But I'm excited to try it! |
Added JSON output to https://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/notification/notifications.php |
Thanks @rs1729 - I'm trying to understand the relationship between this auto_rx project and your RS project; is RS a dependency of auto_rx? Or are they two separate implementations of the same basic idea? |
auto_rx uses the decoders from rs1729/RS. |
Got it, thanks. It looks like the auto_rx code is a copy of RS, not a submodule - does that mean if I want to use your new decoder I need to clone auto_rx, clone RS and copy the files over? |
No, I don't think that is recommended. But there are not so many changes for the decoders. Probably there will be more changes to the signal processing and demodulation at baseband (getting the data from the rtl_sdr to the decoder). EDIT: |
Submodules is something we've been considering; we just need to make sure that all the changes we've made to the decoders end up upstream or write patch files as part of the build.
For the moment it's just been easier to include our own copy of them
Sent from Nine
…________________________________
From: Jeremy Elson <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, 21 March 2019 06:53
To: projecthorus/radiosonde_auto_rx
Cc: Subscribed
Subject: Re: [projecthorus/radiosonde_auto_rx] Support for U.S. radiosondes (#147)
Got it, thanks. It looks like the auto_rx code is a copy of RS, not a submodule - does that mean if I want to use your new decoder I need to clone auto_rx, clone RS and copy the files over?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
Im going to close this and open some tracking issues for RS92-NGP and LMS6 support. |
WMO codes, soundings in May 2019. |
Excellent information, thanks!! |
Don't know about soundings in Cuba Here is a worldwide list, 2019/May: The WMO code are in the common code tables
|
Maps 2018 and 2019: |
New world map 2021/01: |
Very nice, thanks! |
The NOAA NWS site at Miramar Marine Corps Air Station in San Diego is flying the Vaisala RS41-SGP (i.e., the model with the pressure sensor). They use the Vaisala Autosonde automatic launcher. We have recovered many. |
Vandenberg Space Force Base seems to fly both the LMS6-403 and the LMS-403-2, often in flurries before Falcon 9 rocket launches. The LMS-403-2 sondes rise, pop and fall normally while the LMS6-403 sondes often become floaters at 16,500-17,500 meters (54,000-57,000 ft) and travel over Los Angeles and Orange or Riverside counties, apparently until battery exhaustion. We don't know if this is intentional, but it is very persistent. |
Hi! I just saw your talk at the Linux conference in Christchurch. At the end you mentioned there currently is not support for U.S. radiosondes. Is there any ongoing work to add support?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: